New Internationalist

Australia: gas hub threat

November 2012

A divided community weighs up whether to protect aboriginal lands or opt for $1.3 billion in compensation.

An item from the Agenda section of the magazine, where we look beyond the news curve with reports and comment on breaking stories.

Controversy over a proposed gas hub in the remote Kimberley region of Western Australia has split the old pearling town of Broome, and is threatening to balloon into a national political issue.

The headland in question, James Price Point (JPP) pokes into the Indian Ocean some 50 kilometres from Broome. The State government has proposed it be used for a $40-billion facility to liquefy natural gas pumped from offshore fields.

Now there is talk of a Royal Commission. At the heart of the new debate are allegations that the Western Australian government and the main backer of the project – Perth-based resource company Woodside Petroleum – have ignored the state’s indigenous heritage laws.

Talhy Stotzer/AAP/Press Association Images
Talhy Stotzer/AAP/Press Association Images

But to complicate the picture, there are further allegations that the Kimberley Land Council (KLC) – an association of Aboriginal people in the region – has worked with Woodside and the state against the interests of some of its own clients.

One of the main opponents of the hub is the Green Party’s Robin Chapple. He obtained reports and correspondence through freedom of information requests which showed that, long before the gas hub was first proposed, the state had identified Joseph Roe (pictured above), Law Boss for the Goolarabooloo people, as the authority to speak to about using the land. Roe has unique knowledge of the religious and cultural traditions of JPP and has the responsibility for keeping those traditions alive.

The state also knew that when Roe and other law bosses met in 2005, they decided the area was too sensitive to be developed.

From there, the KLC and Roe went their separate ways. While the KLC has continued to support the gas hub, Roe and other bosses are still withholding their consent.

Add to that a nearby humpback whale migration zone and fossilized dinosaur footprints on the beach, and it’s a perfect storm of activist causes.

Except it’s not quite that simple. By deciding in favour of the gas hub, the KLC will receive a $1.3 billion compensation package. This will be spent to address high rates of unemployment and youth suicide, and an average life expectancy that is 16 years lower than for non-indigenous Australians.

Chapple fears that once the opposition to development is broken, the state will be free to mine the region’s copper, bauxite, uranium and coal, as outlined under a 2005 state development plan. He sees the JPP gas hub as a ‘psychological beachhead’ for the industrialization of the wilderness.

The project backers are expected to give the go-ahead – or otherwise – before mid-2013.

Front cover of New Internationalist magazine, issue 457 This feature was published in the November 2012 issue of New Internationalist. To read more, buy this issue or subscribe.

Comments on Australia: gas hub threat

Leave your comment


  • Maximum characters allowed: 5000
  • Simple HTML allowed: bold, italic, and links

Registration is quick and easy. Plus you won’t have to re-type the blurry words to comment!
Register | Login

...And all is quiet.

Subscribe to Comments for this articleArticle Comment Feed RSS 2.0

Guidelines: Please be respectful of others when posting your reply.

Get our free fortnightly eNews


Videos from visionOntv’s globalviews channel.

Related articles

Recently in Agenda

All Agenda

Popular tags

All tags

This article was originally published in issue 457

New Internationalist Magazine issue 457
Issue 457

More articles from this issue

  • Is there a place for GM crops in a sustainable future?

    November 1, 2012

    Author and journalist Mark Lynas and researcher and writer Claire Robinson go head-to-head.

  • Bad medicine

    November 1, 2012

    Inequality squeezes both how healthy we are and the healthcare we get. Time to get past it, believes Dinyar Godrej.

  • Spain’s brain drain

    November 1, 2012

    Dan Hancox on the skilled young people who, after thirty years of Spanish democracy, are finding their options increasingly limited.

New Internationalist Magazine Issue 436

If you would like to know something about what's actually going on, rather than what people would like you to think was going on, then read the New Internationalist.

– Emma Thompson –

A subscription to suit you

Save money with a digital subscription. Give a gift subscription that will last all year. Or get yourself a free trial to New Internationalist. See our choice of offers.