New Internationalist

Eurovision re-opens old wounds in the Caucasus

May 2012

Azerbaijan’s hosting of the event on 26 May has caused tensions in the region as Armenia pulls out.

An item from the Agenda section of the magazine, where we look beyond the news curve with reports and comment on breaking stories.

Armenia and Azerbaijan are sworn enemies, locked into a bitter stalemate over the disputed territory of Nagorno Karabakh. Around 25,000 people died and a million were forced to flee their homes by fighting between the two former Soviet republics in the early 1990s. Lasting peace remains elusive, despite a ceasefire agreement signed in 1994. Scores of conscripts die each year in cross-border skirmishes, but recently the conflict has moved to a new and unlikely battleground – the Eurovision Song Contest.

The kitsch and glitzy music competition has had its fair share of scandals since its inception in 1956, despite the original intention to draw countries from the European Broadcast Union (EBU) closer together. However, the recent inclusion of post-Soviet states has taken national rivalry to new heights.

AP Photo / Frank Augstein
Last year’s winners, Azerbaijan – creating more of a furore than they could have imagined. AP Photo / Frank Augstein

Armenia entered Eurovision in 2006, followed by Georgia in 2007 and Azerbaijan the following year; bitter rivalry between the countries of the South Caucasus was evident from the outset.

In 2009, in the wake of its August 2008 war with Russia, Georgia pulled out after its song, apparently mocking President Vladimir Putin, was considered ‘too political’.

In 2009, Armenia ruffled Azerbaijani feathers with a promotional video that featured a statue in the contested Nagorno Karabakh region. This falls under Armenian control, but is considered sovereign Azerbaijan by the international community. Forced to drop the video, Armenia defiantly displayed the offending statue as the main image for its slot during the international tele-voting, which was broadcast live to millions.

Later the same year, in perhaps the worst incident of petty bickering between the two countries, 43 Azerbaijanis who voted for Armenia during the competition were called in for questioning by National Security Service agents.

No wonder, then, that when Azerbaijan won the competition last year, earning itself the right to host the event in its capital, Baku, in 2012, alarm bells rang in Armenia. Given that citizens of either country cannot visit the other under normal circumstances, additional security guarantees for Armenia’s delegation were sought from the EBU, which said that it would not intervene. Armenia formally withdrew from the competition on 7 March.

The problems are not confined to a spat with Armenia. Online activists and journalists are facing intimidation, detention and imprisonment in Azerbaijan, prompting international human rights and other organizations to cast doubts on the country’s suitability to stage Eurovision in the first place. Both local and international groups have flagged up the forced eviction of homeowners to construct the Crystal Hall Stadium where Eurovision will be held.

But some activists disagree. They argue that the international spotlight may result in much-needed reform and change. For now, however, the omens do not look good.

Front cover of New Internationalist magazine, issue 452 This feature was published in the May 2012 issue of New Internationalist. To read more, buy this issue or subscribe.

Comments on Eurovision re-opens old wounds in the Caucasus

Leave your comment







 

  • Maximum characters allowed: 5000
  • Simple HTML allowed: bold, italic, and links

Registration is quick and easy. Plus you won’t have to re-type the blurry words to comment!
Register | Login

...And all is quiet.

Subscribe to Comments for this articleArticle Comment Feed RSS 2.0

Guidelines: Please be respectful of others when posting your reply.

Get our free fortnightly eNews

Multimedia

Videos from visionOntv’s globalviews channel.

Related articles

Recently in Agenda

All Agenda

Popular tags

All tags

This article was originally published in issue 452

New Internationalist Magazine issue 452
Issue 452

More articles from this issue

  • Not in front of the children!

    May 1, 2012

    Steve Parry's daughter is being brought up in a radical household. But could this tactic backfire?

  • When Western therapies fail

    May 1, 2012

    Is a Western approach the best way to engage with the mental health issues of other cultures? Nick Harvey visits Burmese refugees in Thailand to find out.

  • Xstrata's killing fields

    May 1, 2012

    Look at Peru if you think mining giant Xstrata should merge with Glencore. Stephanie Boyd reports.

New Internationalist Magazine Issue 436

If you would like to know something about what's actually going on, rather than what people would like you to think was going on, then read the New Internationalist.

– Emma Thompson –

A subscription to suit you

Save money with a digital subscription. Give a gift subscription that will last all year. Or get yourself a free trial to New Internationalist. See our choice of offers.

Subscribe