New Internationalist

The EU-Morocco Fisheries Partnership

March 2011

Expiry of EU-Morocco Fisheries Partnership: 1st March

An item from the Agenda section of the magazine, where we look beyond the news curve with reports and comment on breaking stories.

Photo by Maria Fonfara /
The next step: Western Saharawi fisherfolk are demanding the right to fish in their own waters. Photo by Maria Fonfara /

Imagine if someone kicked down your front door, moved into your house, locked you in the cellar and sold your belongings,’ says Lamine Baali, representative of Western Sahara’s liberation movement, the Polisario Front. ‘This is what the Moroccans are doing in Western Sahara, with the help of the EU.’ Speaking on the eve of the expiry of the Fisheries Partnership Agreement between the European Union and Morocco, Baali is adamant that the agreement should not be renewed in its present form. Signed in 2006, it controversially granted licences to 119 EU vessels – predominately Spanish – to fish the waters off Western Sahara’s 1,100-kilometre coastline. But disagreements over the ethics and legality of fishing Western Saharan waters have meant that renewal of the accord, at least in the short-term, will not happen, and from 1 March fishing boats under European flags will have to leave the area.

With Western Sahara’s vast mineral resources and rich sea resources – which the EU has paid Morocco $49 million to fish – it is easy to see why Morocco maintains an occupation that has lasted over 35 years and is reluctant to cede control. But the failure to renew the fisheries agreement demonstrates a growing sense of unease at the exploitation of the territory’s resources.

Last year the publication of a previously confidential legal opinion showed that the European Parliament’s Legal Service viewed the fishing by European vessels in Western Sahara’s waters to be in violation of international law. This view supports that of the UN Legal Adviser, Hans Corell, whose 2002 legal opinion for the UN Security Council on Western Sahara’s natural resources made clear that exploitation of the territory’s resources could only be considered legal if the Saharawi population were consulted and benefited. But there has been no consultation and according to human rights activist Aminatou Haidar, ‘The Saharawi do not benefit at all from this agreement. Instead it only intensifies their oppression.’

The Spanish and French are already lobbying hard for the renewal of the agreement, but speaking from Brussels just weeks before the agreement was due to expire, Sara Eyckmans of the campaign group Western Sahara Resource Watch, was confident that there would be ‘a lull’ in the continuation of the agreement. ‘It is not clear which line the Commission will take,’ she explained. ‘EU vessels will definitely be forced to leave but it is possible that some of them will just change flags and come back to fish under, say, a Moroccan flag.’

Another concern is that a new EU-Morocco agreement of reciprocal liberalization measures on agricultural and fisheries products, signed on 13 December, will open another opportunity for resource exploitation. Like the fisheries agreement, this new accord, still to be agreed by the European Parliament, does not exclude agricultural and fisheries products originating from Western Sahara.

Stefan Simanowitz

Front cover of New Internationalist magazine, issue 440 This feature was published in the March 2011 issue of New Internationalist. To read more, buy this issue or subscribe.

Comments on The EU-Morocco Fisheries Partnership

Leave your comment


  • Maximum characters allowed: 5000
  • Simple HTML allowed: bold, italic, and links

Registration is quick and easy. Plus you won’t have to re-type the blurry words to comment!
Register | Login

...And all is quiet.

Subscribe to Comments for this articleArticle Comment Feed RSS 2.0

Guidelines: Please be respectful of others when posting your reply.

Get our free fortnightly eNews


Videos from visionOntv’s globalviews channel.

Related articles

Recently in Agenda

All Agenda

Popular tags

All tags

This article was originally published in issue 440

New Internationalist Magazine issue 440
Issue 440

More articles from this issue

New Internationalist Magazine Issue 436

If you would like to know something about what's actually going on, rather than what people would like you to think was going on, then read the New Internationalist.

– Emma Thompson –

A subscription to suit you

Save money with a digital subscription. Give a gift subscription that will last all year. Or get yourself a free trial to New Internationalist. See our choice of offers.