New Internationalist

Why we should feel positive about Paris

Web exclusive

Though the deal was a dud, this was no Copenhagen, argue Jess Worth and Danny Chivers.

1-590.jpg [Related Image]
'D12' day of action, Paris, France, 12 December 2015. Yann Levy / under a Creative Commons Licence

As the final text of the Paris deal was being wrestled into shape, we were standing near the Arc de Triomphe, underneath a huge red line. This stretch of scarlet fabric was one of many held aloft by chanting and singing members of a 15,000-strong crowd. They – we – were there to demand climate justice; to condemn an international deal that we already knew would cross crucial red lines for the climate.

Yann Levy /
'D12' day of action, Paris, France, 12 December 2015. Yann Levy /

At the front of the #redlines demonstration, representatives from Indigenous and frontline communities gave powerful speeches, explaining how the Paris deal contained nothing to prevent the pollution and destruction of their lands and cultures. At the same time, mainstream media outlets – and supposedly ‘progressive’ NGOs like Avaaz – were preparing to announce a ‘historic deal’ that would signal the end of the fossil fuel age and catapult us into a bright, clean energy future.

In reality, the details of the Paris deal are dreadful. The contrast between the analysis from people on the frontlines of climate change, and the triumphant rhetoric of governments and many NGOs, could not be more stark. Indigenous peoples at the talks condemned it as a package of ‘false solutions’. The peasant farmers’ movement La Via Campesina called it a ‘masquerade’. Friends of the Earth International called it a ‘sham’. Our email inboxes are full of quotes from frontline representatives horrified at a deal that – if followed to the letter – would mean at least a 2.7 degree temperature rise and the utter devastation of their communities.

The Truth Behind the Paris Climate Deal

The western media has reported the Paris climate deal as a great success. So why did thousands take to the streets yesterday to denounce it?For an in-depth exposé of the deal:

Posted by New Internationalist Magazine on Sunday, December 13, 2015

We understand why so many people want to celebrate this deal. There’s precious little good news on the climate change front. There is a risk that too much negativity will make people switch off and succumb to the same cold wind of despair that swept across climate change campaigns in the North after the collapse of Copenhagen. But the thing is, we’re not feeling negative. Despite the dire details of the deal, we’re feeling uplifted and hopeful from our time in Paris. That positivity comes not from the negotiation chambers, but from the incredible activities out on the streets of Paris and around the world over these last two weeks.

Of course there are elements of the deal that climate justice activists can use. The fact that governments have theoretically signed up to a 1.5 C degree warming limit does provide, in the words of ActionAid, ‘an important hook on which people can hang their demands’. The vague promise of ‘balancing’ carbon emissions by the second half of the century gives added weight to arguments that the fossil fuel industry is ultimately doomed. Our movements should, and must, use these statements as tools in our struggles. But to openly celebrate this deal would be a kick in the teeth to the hundreds of millions of people for whom its wording spells out the end of their homes and livelihoods.

To praise governments for achieving this agreement would implicitly endorse the bullying and misinformation tactics that were used to create it. From the myth of the ‘high-ambition hundred’ who were really only 15, to the demonising of developing countries for attempting to defend their development rights, to the shameful last-minute attempts by the US to bust the whole deal and go home; by calling Paris a ‘success’ we imply that these methods were acceptable.

The climate justice movement has learned and grown since Copenhagen. Activists went into these talks with their eyes open, knowing in advance that our politicians (and the corporations who massively influence them) would not deliver an adequate deal. Rather than focus their hopes and energies on the summit itself, people have used it as an opportunity to organize, to mobilize, to build new links, strengthen existing networks and announce ambitious future plans for action.

Despite the French government’s opportunistic protest ban, people have come together with courage, creativity and determination to make their dissent known. Despite house arrests and police crackdowns, thousands took to the streets without permission at the start of the talks. Six hundred advertisements across Paris were replaced with works of revolutionary climate art. An unofficial critical tour of the ‘Solutions 21’ corporate greenwash fair was met by an over-the-top police response; our film of the event has now been viewed more than 7 million times. A new global movement for ‘fossil free culture’ was launched with a rebel performance at the Louvre that saw ten arrests and a daring illicit video message from inside a police cell. Hundreds took part in the Climate Games, launching creative stunts from vegetable invasions to toilet-roll hijacks.

Frontline communities have played a leading role in these activities. La Via Campesina targeted Danone’s headquarters in a challenge to agribusiness’ false climate solutions. Indigenous representatives from the incredible It Takes Roots grassroots delegation opened the Paris demonstrations with a powerful healing ritual. Alongside other Indigenous and frontline representatives they held a series of events and actions throughout the fortnight, including a flotilla of kayaks challenging fossil fuel extraction and an outspoken protest at the headquarters of oil company Total.

By December 12th, the ‘state of emergency’ protest restrictions had been largely shown up as unenforceable and - with huge numbers expected - the French government had little choice but to give permission for the #redlines action by the Arc de Triomphe. Thousands of people chose to push things further, with an unauthorised march to the Eiffel Tower and a sit-in on the Pont des Arts bridge. None of this would have seemed possible a fortnight ago – the tens of thousands gathered in Paris had effectively overturned the protest ban and taken back the streets.

Yesterday’s red lines represented the basic criteria for survival that the Paris deal has failed to meet. The protest was a clear statement of intent: if governments won’t defend these lines, then we, the people, will. Unlike Copenhagen – which ended with a freezing, frustrated gathering hemmed in by riot police – people will be flooding home from Paris with renewed determination, connections, and inspiration, ready to bring the fight back to where they live.

Most important of all are the steps that have been taken to build solidarity between Northern campaigners and Southern, Indigenous and frontline activists. To take just one example: an extraordinary gathering called ‘Frontline Fightback’ brought together over 100 people from 30 different countries, from South Africa to El Salvador to Palestine, to share strategies of resistance and build common ground. There is still a long way to go – and some Northern organizers are still getting things disastrously wrong – but the understanding is growing that the true leaders of the climate movement are the people fighting fossil fuel extraction and false climate solutions in their own communities and on their own lands. In the words of Kandi Mossett in yesterday’s Indigenous bloc, ‘we are the frontlines, we are the red lines’.

Allan Lisner / Indigenous Environment Network
Indigenous bloc at 'red lines' actions, Paris, France, 12 December 2015. Allan Lisner / Indigenous Environment Network

It is in these global alliances, in building a true movement of movements, that real hope now lies. So when we see well-intentioned Northern campaigners hailing the Paris deal as a success, or a ‘good first step’ we feel serious concern. If we promote this narrative, then we are shutting out the voices of those whose rights and lives have been trampled by the text of the agreement.

To say that this is a bad deal is not giving in to despair. It is opening the door to a different kind of hope. The Paris deal lays down a marker – it tells us how far our governments have come, and how much further things now need to be pushed. Yes, we can use elements of the Paris deal as tools in the struggle, but most of us know that even a perfect deal on paper would not deliver the real changes we need without serious pressure from below. We need to take our dreams away from politicians and invest them in ourselves.

Through our own actions, we can make fossil fuels politically, economically, physically impossible to extract. We can delegitimize destructive industries through divestment and sponsorship campaigns, and strip them of their power. We can take control of the real clean energy solutions ourselves and force governments to act on their responsibilities. We can defend the forests and small farms that will cool the planet, by fighting for the rights of Indigenous peoples, peasants and local communities. We can challenge the neo-colonial narratives that sacrifice the lives of people of colour around the world to enrich wealthy white elites.

These struggles are already underway, and people around the world are winning important victories, from North American pipelines to Indian coal plants to the rights of forest peoples. Meanwhile, elements of the economic and financial context we are acting in have shifted dramatically since Copenhagen. The slump in oil prices has dealt a potentially catastrophic blow to the oil industry. Suddenly, the most expensive and polluting sources of oil are no longer economically viable. We are seeing fracking companies go under, tar sands pipelines and projects cancelled, and most famously, Shell pull out of Arctic drilling. The low price of coal is having a similarly devastating impact on the coal industry. Meanwhile, the boom in renewables has meant that they are starting to be able to compete with fossil fuels on price in some parts of the world. Even Mark Carney, the governor of the Bank of England, has warned investors that they face ‘potentially huge’ losses from investing in vast reserves of oil, coal and gas that are becoming ‘literally unburnable’.

If the climate justice movement can seize these opportunities in 2016, victories could snowball, leading to a significant change in the political context in which future climate negotiations take place. Imagine a COP where industrialized countries are no longer beholden to fossil fuel giants, and democratically-controlled renewable energy is the main game in town. Imagine a COP where the voices of frontline and affected people hold more sway than the demands of the corporations. Then, and only then, might we get a climate deal worthy of the name.

We the movement – not governments – have taken a step in that direction in Paris. See you in 2016.

Comments on Why we should feel positive about Paris

Leave your comment


  • Maximum characters allowed: 5000
  • Simple HTML allowed: bold, italic, and links

Registration is quick and easy. Plus you won’t have to re-type the blurry words to comment!
Register | Login

  1. #1 HuynhPham 13 Dec 15

    Yes, I fell relieved when I met this pieces of opinions.

    If you, I could not identify or unify with activists against my will because I had not contribute anything, proclaim that the deal was a failure it was so unfair to you yourselves.

    If we all know that the system is always to reserve and maintain itself, therefore we foresee there would be no big change from it or the people having power, they have been ignoring the threats to public security, or destroying it their hands, what is the point of social & political movements which have been trying to warn the evil?

    We could not tell to what extent that activists influence or exert their voices into the COP21, but without that sort of reactions in general, for sure we would haven't had any deals. Though, indeed the agreement is not satisfactory to many who know how serious the climate change is going on, it is still an achievement, an forward step.

    And, I would think the movement could not be identified with some deals, some events or some acts. If one choose to fight for something, his fight seems a long life activity.

  2. #2 Maggie Mason 14 Dec 15

    I agree with this analysis of the Paris Agreement.I was with a group of Cumbrians in Paris and we met and shared with many people from around the world. THE AGREEMENT IS NOWHERE NEAR ADEQUATE. The commitments would lead to 2.7 degrees at least even if they were carried through, there is no workable mechanism to achieve emission reductions, the market system, trading and offsets will not keep fossil fuels in the ground alone.
    However, the Agreement can possibly be used to push forward for the lowest temperature rise that can be achieved (it will surely be more than 1.5 degrees), countries and companies must be challenged, to discredit those who attempt to continue with business as usual.We need equality, justice, and peace if we are to survive as a human race . It will not be easy but we can succeed.

  3. #3 Sai Baba 16 Dec 15

    it is not about climate change, it is about the climate of consciousness which is heating up. Raise your consciousness by reading the essays of Kate of Gaia. Here is the link:
    Basically I like to inform all of you that the biggest lie you have been told is that you are a legal name. Accepting the fact that you are a legal name, makes you a slave and I explain you why? The conspiracy against humanity started long ago in Babylon and we know now that the same bloodlines who where there are the ones we call the elite. The Narmer Palette: was introduced by the Egyptian Pharaoh King Narmer. To make contract with slaves he gave them names and when they responded to that name the agents of the King got the agreement they needed. In The Romans started to give Titles to Humans and started to create big Egos for the ones with Titles.
    In more recent times the Roman Empire shifted its Administration to London where all the Birth Certificates of Humans are hold as collaterals for the debt accumulated.
    When you believe to be a legal name - you are a criminal in their eyes - and that is because IT IS ILLEGAL TO USE A LEGAL NAME. This is a legal fact. The name you think is yours is copyrighted by the Crown Corporation of the City of London, State and the moment you are using it to do business you are using a name which is not yours and all the courts on the planet are considering you a criminal. That is why you cannot talk in their courts, you need an advocate. Think about it?
    For any clarification you can call me on Skype saibabavertum. Also just google legal name fraud and lots of info will pup up.....

  4. #4 Chrissie Wilson 17 Dec 15

    I felt despair at the 'deal' that was lauded by the press at the end of COP21, but this article has given me hope, especially about the alliances that have been built outside the conference centre. They must be the foundation of the truly global climate justice movement.

    Your coverage has been inspiring. Thank you.

Subscribe to Comments for this articleArticle Comment Feed RSS 2.0

Guidelines: Please be respectful of others when posting your reply.

Get our free fortnightly eNews


Videos from visionOntv’s globalviews channel.

Related articles

Recently in Web exclusives

All Web exclusives

Popular tags

All tags

New Internationalist Magazine Issue 436

If you would like to know something about what's actually going on, rather than what people would like you to think was going on, then read the New Internationalist.

– Emma Thompson –

A subscription to suit you

Save money with a digital subscription. Give a gift subscription that will last all year. Or get yourself a free trial to New Internationalist. See our choice of offers.