New Internationalist

Biofuels - the good, the bad and the ugly

Issue 444

Facts about the many different types of biofuel: their sources, use and environmental impact.

Wood fuel

The original biofuel, as used in the discovery of fire and a firm favourite for millions of years.

Jargon: ‘Biomass’ usually means wood.

Current use: Around 90 per cent of all biofuel use is locally harvested wood, charcoal and dung for small cooking stoves. Thirty-eight per cent of the world’s population rely on this energy, and its pollution kills around 1.5 million people per year. The single biofuel technology that could provide the greatest benefit to the world is probably the cleaner-burning wood stove.

New ‘biomass’ power stations are springing up around the US, and are proposed for Britain. Where the extra millions of tonnes of wood per year will come from is not yet clear.

Methane from waste

Methane from sewage and domestic waste – in use for thousands of years.

Jargon: Biogas or biomethane.

Current use: With the help of new anaerobic digesters (which convert food waste into methane gas and organic fertilizer), around 30 million homes in China and India now make their own cooking and heating gas in this way. Also has potential as vehicle fuel – but waste is not an unlimited resource, and overall more energy (and carbon) would be saved by producing less waste in the first place! Some companies are talking about making biogas by fermenting new crops rather than from waste, which would have the same problems as liquid biofuels (see 4-7).

Recycled cooking oil

Waste oil from restaurants and fast-food joints which is reprocessed into fuel.

Jargon: Confusingly, fuels made from vegetable oils are often referred to simply as ‘biodiesel’, whether they are recycled or made from new crops.

Current use: There’s only a limited amount of waste oil sloshing around. Even if all the available waste oil in the US were poured into its cars, it would replace less than 0.1 per cent of the nation’s liquid fuels.

Ethanol and biodiesel

Ethanol is made from sugary or starchy crops such as corn, sugar cane, wheat, sugar beet and barley. Biodiesel is made from oily crops such as soybean, rapeseed, oilseed and oil palm.

Jargon: ‘First generation’ biofuels.

Current use: These make up nearly all of the existing liquid biofuels. The biggest producers are the US (around 40 billion litres of corn ethanol per year) and Brazil (25 billion litres of sugar cane ethanol). Biodiesel production is much lower – less than 20 billion litres per year for the whole world.

Many countries are already blending these biofuels in with their transport fuel supply – around 3 per cent biodiesel in the EU, and 10 per cent ethanol in the US

Liquid biofuel from wood and grasses

High-yielding non-food crops which can be grown on so-called ‘marginal land’.

Jargon: Cellulosic, or ‘second generation’ biofuels.

Current use: Still at the research stages. The plan is to make ethanol or other liquid fuels from the carbon in the cellulose of plants like elephant grass and willow. ‘Marginal land’ is a brilliantly vague term – most land in the world is being used by someone for something, or is important for ecosystem maintenance. This technique could be useful for growing some specialized fuels on a limited scale under careful control, but otherwise it could gobble up grazing land, wilderness, or end up on arable land anyway to improve yields and make a bigger profit.

Liquid fuels from agricultural waste

From waste such as corn stover – the leftover bits which aren’t eaten by humans.

Jargon: Sometimes grouped together with second generation biofuels, sometimes termed third generation. They’re also cellulosic (made from the carbon in cellulose).

Current use: Also still at the research stage. This could be a useful source of liquid fuel on a local, well-managed scale, but in mass production it could end up creating serious problems. Some ‘wastes’ like straw have many other uses that would need to be provided by other materials instead; crop residues are also important natural fertilizers, and would need to be replaced by alternative inputs.

Algal fuels

These can be macro-algae (seaweed) or micro-algae (pond scum). Can be grown in the sea or in tanks, and so don’t require agricultural land.

Jargon: Second, third, or even fourth generation, depending on whom you speak to.

Current use: This supposed ‘wonder fuel’ is still in development (and not expected for at least a decade). The huge seaweed farms proposed for the ocean could cause the same sort of problems – reduced biodiversity, unpredictable knock-on ecosystem effects and fertilizer leakage – as land-based monocultures. Tiny oil-producing algae in tanks still need large amounts of space, water, sunlight – and, crucially, nutrients. No-one is clear where these nutrients will come from – the algae will be competing with food crops here, especially for phosphates. The algae are expected to be genetically modified to churn out as much oil as possible – so what happens if (or when) they get loose into streams, rivers and reservoirs?

Sources

WGBU, Future Bioenergy and Sustainable Land Use 2008; nin.tl/mig7A6

Biofuels Digest nin.tl/itTSti

Dept of Biological and Agricultural Engineering, University of Idaho nin.tl/m7vYcF

nin.tl/kXqazR

World Bank Policy Research Working Paper 5364. Biofuels: Markets, Targets and Impacts, July 2010.

REN21, Renewables 2010: Global Status Report, September 2010. nin.tl/kKowSx

ETC Group, The New Biomasters: Synthetic Biology and the Next Assault on Biodiversity and Livelihoods, February 2011.

Photos: Md. Didarul Alam Chowdhury / Drik / Majority World; Daniel under a CC Licence; stellar678 under a CC Licence; tallpomlin under a CC Licence; 24oranges.nl under a CC Licence

This first appeared in our award-winning magazine - to read more, subscribe from just £7

Comments on Biofuels - the good, the bad and the ugly

Leave your comment







 

  • Maximum characters allowed: 5000
  • Simple HTML allowed: bold, italic, and links

Registration is quick and easy. Plus you won’t have to re-type the blurry words to comment!
Register | Login

  1. #1 Lesley 26 Aug 11

    What a hater! An advertly negative article like this one hampers the development of the huge potential of this industry (if done correctly). Arguments like ’waste is a limited resource’ are extreemly unhelful. For anyone in the waste management sphere, the problem sure does long endless at the moment! Furthermore, ss long as we are eating and pooing, there will always be opportunities to generate energy from the bi-products of theese processes. Your article neglects to mention what is probably the worlds biggest generator of bioenergy - wastewater treatment plants - given theres 13 times more than the energy required in our waste than is used to treat it, developing this industry will see our wastewater treatment plants grow from energy users to producers in the years ahead!

  2. #2 Mr.Gary Bismark 02 Sep 11

    Hello Owner,
    Am Mr.Gary Bismark,and am inquiring about some Garden Liquid Fertilizer .At the moment i will like you to send me an e-mail with some few list on the one's you got in stock with there prices.Or email me back with your website for me to view the type.After that I'll show the type and i want to order.And also let me know the type of credit cards you do accept as payment.Thank you and waiting to hear back from you soon.

    Kind regards.
    Mr.Gary Bismark.

  3. #4 alex 21 Sep 11

    Thanks for this post. I also found a video related to the things you discussed. In the video, David Steiner, Waste Management's CEO, gives Melissa McGinnis a tour of their CORE program and facility. The first of its kind in the US, this anaerobic converter takes food waste and meticulously converts it into energy. The end result now is energy for electricity, but the long term plan is to be able to convert food waste into jet fuel! http://youtu.be/cdCOcLaIN-E

  4. #8 J3rrYcid 24 Oct 12

    To embrace biofuels, we need to also understand their advantages and disadvantages. Not every kind of buifuel is suitable for every region on the planet. I agree that we definitely need alternatives to petroleum, but to find the next best alternative would require more research.

Subscribe to Comments for this articleArticle Comment Feed RSS 2.0

Guidelines: Please be respectful of others when posting your reply.

This article was originally published in issue 444

New Internationalist Magazine issue 444
Issue 444

More articles from this issue

  • What is a 'true Egyptian'?

    July 1, 2011

    There may be no easy answer, but identity has become an obsession, discovers Maria Golia, among a people in turmoil.

  • The US is not teetering on the edge of bankruptcy

    July 1, 2011

    As Obama ushers in a new debit-limit bill, Mark Engler explains how the argument ‘We’re broke’ is used to justify the demolition of social safety nets.

  • Interview with Adam Beach

    July 1, 2011

    The Canadian First Nations actor, star of Bury My Heart at Wounded Knee and US TV dramas Big Love and Law and Order, talks to Sian Griffiths about the importance of being a role model for young aboriginal kids.

New Internationalist Magazine Issue 436

If you would like to know something about what's actually going on, rather than what people would like you to think was going on, then read the New Internationalist.

– Emma Thompson –

A subscription to suit you

Save money with a digital subscription. Give a gift subscription that will last all year. Or get yourself a free trial to New Internationalist. See our choice of offers.

Subscribe