New Internationalist

Eyes to the far right

June 2011

K Biswas charts the rise of ‘nativist’ populism in Europe.

Paul Hackett / Reuters
A hard-line look: an English Defence League supporter wears contact lenses sporting the St George cross – a symbol for some of white supremacy.
Paul Hackett / Reuters

If Sweden had a majority of Muslims who wanted Sharia Law, what do you think would happen?’

Posing the question is Kent Ekeroth, a newly elected member of parliament for the far-right Sweden Democrats (SD). In his neat little office inside the beautiful Riksdag (parliament) building, located on a tiny island in the centre of Stockholm, the party’s International Secretary becomes more animated when the issue of Muslim immigration is discussed. ‘I don’t want to see the chopping off of hands because somebody steals a loaf of bread,’ he says.

In last September’s general election SD managed to win representation for the first time in its history, controlling 20 seats and holding the balance of power – in a country renowned for its embrace of tolerance and cultural diversity. ‘We changed the debate,’ Ekeroth proudly claims. ‘They can’t ignore us like they used to before.’

SD seeks to divide the electorate between ‘natives’ and ‘immigrants’ and says that ‘immigrants’ benefit from liberal social policies while ‘natives’ suffer. The party focused its election campaign on the two southern-most counties – Skåne and Blekinge – where worries around welfare, long-term job prospects and integration loom largest.

Daniel Poohl, whose magazine Expo (founded by the author of The Girl with the Dragon Tattoo, the late Stieg Larsson) monitors the Swedish far right, observes: ‘SD was able to say to Swedes that the problems they see in society and the problems that they have personally are directly linked to immigration. And those who ended up voting for the Sweden Democrats believed in what the party was saying.’

The party released selective crime statistics showing that Africans and Arabs committed a high number of sexual assaults, and used every opportunity to rally against the ‘multicultural Swedish power-élite’ for not standing up for their own citizens. In the run-up to the election it broadcast a TV advert depicting a group of women in Islamic dress jostling past an elderly white woman to take money from the country’s budget. Sweden’s former Social Democrat chair, Mona Sahlin, called this ‘an incitement to hatred’.

SD’s success is by no means unique. Extreme nationalists and ultra-right populists have found parliamentary footholds across Western Europe. Their anti-immigrant/anti-élite rhetoric chimes with a significant number of voters. Geert Wilders – who, in his own words, ‘hates Islam’ – and his Party for Freedom (PVV) prop up the Dutch government. The Front National’s new leader, Marine Le Pen, is outpolling Nicholas Sarkozy in the run-up to next year’s French presidential election. In Austria, Italy and Denmark, parties of the far right have been in partnership governments during the last decade. An insurgent radical rightwing strand pollutes representative politics in most nations across the continent.

Public debates on ‘national identity’ are blurring the lines between acceptable political discussion and divisive rhetoric that marginalizes minorities. These ‘conversations’ redefine what it means to be a citizen, and Europe’s non-white citizenry are largely left out of them. Disorganized parties that once garnered disparate, fluctuating support have honed their language, policies and organizational capabilities and been voted into parliaments across the continent.

How can this have happened?


My party and I are a threat to the political élite,’ said Geert Wilders in November 2010. ‘Take a look at German Chancellor Angela Merkel, who is now trying to create a copy.’

Political commentators often argue that the far right thrives because mainstream politicians have failed to discuss immigration, for fear of offending minority ethnic groups. But listen to the tough-talking statements made by Europe’s political leaders in recent years and you may question this logic. Angela Merkel has claimed that ‘multiculturalism has utterly failed’ in Germany. Nicholas Sarkozy has said that France does not want immigration ‘inflicted’ on itself. Silvio Berlusconi has stated that Italy is not, and should never be, a ‘multi-ethnic country’.

An insurgent radical rightwing strand pollutes representative politics in most nations across the continent

It is not just politicians on the conservative right who seek to make political capital from anti-immigrant sentiment. In Britain, Labour’s former Immigration Minister, Phil Woolas, looked to ‘make white folk angry’ by exploiting racial and religious divisions in his 2010 general election campaign. Dutch Labour chair Liliane Ploumen raised the ‘self-designated victimization’ and disproportionate levels of ‘criminality and trouble-making’ of immigrants in the Netherlands.

Kent Ekeroth has noticed the change. He joined SD five years ago, eschewing the opportunity to join the mainstream Liberal People’s Party for a party with roots in the ‘White Power’ neo-fascist movements of the 1980s and 1990s. During that time, the party was ignored by politicians and ridiculed by the media due to its toxic agenda, accompanied by racist bombast and party members’ penchant for Nazi uniforms.

Now the SD boasts that mainstream parties across Europe are adopting sanitized versions of their policies. Figures like Ekeroth are taking heart. ‘What happened recently in Germany is astounding,’ he says. ‘First, [Angela] Merkel talked about the failures of multiculturalism. Then the Interior Minister said that “Islam has no place here”. Then the Finance Minister said that third-generation immigrants are worse than the first generation.’ They were all referring to the history of Turkish Muslim integration in their country, which is seen as contributing to a loss of identity.


Pascal Rossignol / Reuters
Marine Le Pen, leader of the far-right Front National, has her eyes on the French presidency.
Pascal Rossignol / Reuters

The mainstream has shifted to a point where “national identity” has a big role,’ says Professor Cas Mudde, a Dutch academic who has studied the relationship between the radical right and established parties. He sees populist far-right parties as radicalized interpretations of the mainstream – a product of society’s fears. ‘Every country has a constituency that shares the values of the radical right. And its key values of nativism, authoritarianism and populism all link to mainstream understanding within Western democracies. For example, nativism is a radical interpretation of the “strong nation-state”. As a consequence, there is a rather large breeding ground for radical right parties that mainstream parties can also tap into.’

The argument that mainstream figures are in some way frightened of discussing immigration obscures the key reasons why the far right thrives: it opportunistically takes advantage of economic and social fears, a lack of trust in the political class, and the growing ‘legitimization’ of Islamophobia in public discourse.

Across the continent, far-right populist parties have sought success around places of intense economic deprivation and social breakdown. Europe’s immigrants disproportionately live in urban areas where poverty and unemployment are highest, and it is here that xenophobic political parties have been successful. The global economic meltdown has given these parties a chance to attack ‘open door’ immigration policies as a drain on essential resources, arguing that their native countrymen and -women are being overlooked.

Last year alone, regional elections in France saw Front National leader Marine Le Pen and her predecessor father, Jean-Marie, take substantial votes in areas severely hit by recession. In northern Italy, with its high levels of poverty and significant non-white population, support for Lega Nord strengthened. The Party’s posters depicted a Native American next to the words: ‘They also underwent immigration – now they live in reservations.’ There was a strong showing for far-right parties in Vienna and Malmö, cities with a firm socialist heritage where industrial and demographic changes brought bitterness to decaying communities desperate for someone to blame.

The implications of accepting refugees from Africa and the Middle East are regularly cited by the far right, even though in Europe the right to seek asylum and freedom from persecution are guaranteed by international law.

Europe can’t welcome you,’ Marine Le Pen recently told two undocumented migrants who had fled to the small Italian island of Lampedusa from Tunisia following January’s uprising. ‘We don’t have the financial means.’

Inconvenient truth

Frida Metso, chair of voluntary organization FARR, works to support asylum seekers and refugees in Sweden, which like much of Europe has tightened its migration laws over recent years. She is passionate and articulate when explaining the anguish that many refugees go through – torn from their families, hiding or living on the streets, denied social security or the right to work. She is angry at parties like the Sweden Democrats for portraying most refugees as undeserving or bogus.

A lot of these people are totally desperate – fleeing from dictatorships or leaving a state that is trying to imprison them,’ she says. ‘Some die on the way here. Parties like SD try to convince people that those coming here are not threatened in their home countries, and that they could go back if they wanted to. Those who say that these are not really refugees, that these are all “illegal” immigrants coming here and taking our jobs. Well, it is not true. If they were to meet refugees face to face and speak with them, I have no doubt they would say: “Absolutely, these are people we cannot deport.”’

Hard work

Far-right populist parties try to pitch themselves as the authentic voice of the people; representatives of ‘the silent majority’ addressing issues they claim have long been ignored by politicians. They align themselves with public concerns as a way of extending their reach – championing popular initiatives such as defending social housing or tackling violent crime, or starting their own initiatives, for example, against the building of local mosques or asylum centres.

They mobilize the public by speaking not just about them but directly to them. Much of their success in recent years is down to hard work – their vote is won through vigorous campaigning on the doorstep and by independent net activism, rather than by relying on exposure in the mainstream media. It is in non-regulated public arenas that they hear the range of people’s material concerns – around jobs, pensions, housing, healthcare, welfare – and direct authentic anxieties into action against the political élite.

Politicians like Geert Wilders and the Danish People’s Party’s (DF) self-styled ‘housewife leader’ Pia Kjaersgaard play on their anti-establishment credentials, arguing that the public has been abandoned by privileged parliamentarians who care little for ordinary people’s concerns. Kjaersgaard – or ‘Mamma Pia’ as young party admirers refer to her – has been a support partner of Denmark’s government for the past 10 years, yet presents herself as in touch with people’s ‘ordinary, commonplace attitudes’, unlike other élitist politicians.

Glory days

This anti-establishment, anti-politics thrust is mirrored across the continent, at a time when trust in the political class is at an all-time low. Existing groups of representatives are painted as feeble and corrupt – political pygmies compared to their predecessors. Far-right populists believe that, in the words of Kent Ekeroth, ‘the Western world has become weak as we are not willing to defend our own culture or society’. Only their parties, it is argued, can return European nations back to the glory days.

Party leaders invoke Eisenhower or Churchill in an attempt to shed the ‘Nazi’ label often thrown at them – a tactic shared with the British National Party, which portrays Churchill beaming down at viewers of their election broadcasts. Front National’s election posters show General De Gaulle arguing that ‘France will no longer be France’ unless other races remain a minority. Steps have even been taken by ultra-right parties in Italy to rehabilitate the legacy of Mussolini. The implication is that the mantle of patriotic heroism has been passed on to their parties, as the current crop of politicians is powerless to save their countries from external threats.

The mix of anti-immigration policy and an anti-Europe/anti-establishment discourse is determining the public agenda,’ says Alfred Gusenbauer. He is the former Austrian Chancellor who was leader of the Social Democratic Party between 2000 and 2008 – a challenging period.

When Jorg Haider’s far-right Freedom Party (FPÖ) entered into a coalition government in 2000, it was greeted with alarm – Haider was considered a pariah by the international community, tainted as a xenophobic ultra-nationalist with a history of anti-semitism. The EU advocated sanctions against Austria, and leading statesmen including Gerhard Schroeder, Bill Clinton and Jacques Chirac publicly registered their consternation.

Haider’s successor and protégé, Heinz Christian Strache, is leading the FPÖ into the next election, when it may emerge as the largest parliamentary party. Gusenbauer, who stood against both Haider and Strache, is dismayed but not surprised. ‘Firstly, the FPÖ portrays Austrians as foreigners in their own country, due to immigration. Secondly, more and more sovereignty has been transferred to Europe, meaning that decisions taken by the national parliament are limited in scope. And thirdly, decisions at an economic level are taken far away from Austria in the globalized financial markets. The narrative is that the nation and the self-determination of the people is lost.’

Islam = threat

Parties like the FPÖ have been fortunate to break through at a time of heightened awareness of a new, globalized threat: Islam. The success of many far-right parties is predicated on a significant public distrust of Muslims. Over half of Danes believe that Islam hinders social harmony; three-quarters of citizens from the former East Germany want to ‘seriously limit’ the practice of Islam; half of Britons associate Islam with terrorism; four in ten French people see Muslims living in their country as a ‘threat’ to their national identity; more than half of Austrians believe that ‘Islam poses a threat to the West and our familiar lifestyle’.

Even though Muslims in Europe originate from different parts of the globe – Turks in Germany, North Africans in France, Pakistanis in Britain – they are portrayed as a single monolithic block, unable to integrate into European society. The populist press has played its role in generating public fears of Muslims. In Britain, which has elected no far-right representatives into its national parliament, the Daily Express and Daily Star blare out hate-filled statements from their front pages on an almost daily basis, characterizing Muslims as a homogenous group hell-bent on undermining the British way of life. ‘Muslim Schools ban our culture,’ ‘Muslims get their own laws in Britain,’ ‘Sniffer dogs offend Muslims,’ ‘Muslims tell British – Go to Hell’.

The media have uncritically incorporated the idea that “Islam equals threat”, therefore Muslims are a threat,’ according to Liz Fekete, the Chair of Britain’s Institute of Race Relations. The media are ‘constantly looking for the extreme voice within the Muslim community, because it’s an easy peg to hang a story on. So if a small extremist sect that doesn’t have any legitimacy within the Muslim community is organizing a protest, it becomes the major framework for any public discussion on Muslims.’

A ‘poppy-burning’ demonstration on Remembrance Day by the little-known group Muslims Against Crusades attracted a handful of extremists to Kensington in West London, yet made the front page of many national newspapers.


It is no surprise that arguments about the incompatibility of Islam with ‘Western values’ have shifted from the fringes into mainstream discourse. In recent years, we have seen a growing ‘intellectualization’ of Islamophobia. Some prominent Western commentators (most of whom have historically displayed little or no interest in Islamic culture) have gone out of their way to add credibility to anti-Muslim hysteria.

Reputable publications regularly print scare stories around a supposed Islamic takeover of Europe, filled with overblown talk of demographic time-bombs caused by Muslim immigration and high fertility rates. The continent is forever depicted as being on the frontline of the West’s struggle with Islam, facing the real prospect of a ‘Eurabian’ state.

The US columnist Christopher Caldwell argues that Muslims are ‘patiently conquering Europe’s cities street by street’; the late Italian author Oriana Fallaci claimed that Muslims have been told to come here and ‘breed like rats’. Canadian writer Mark Steyn paints a dystopian future with everyone under ‘40 – make it 60, if not 75’ destined to live in an ‘Islamified Europe’.

Last summer, the Social Democrat Thilo Sarrazin caused a publishing sensation with his book Germany Does Away with Itself, in which he declares: ‘I don’t want the country of my grandchildren and great-grandchildren to be largely Muslim, or that Turkish or Arabic will be spoken in large areas, that women will wear headscarves and the daily rhythm is set by the call of the muezzin.’


Leonhard Foeger / Reuters
A candlelit vigil in opposition to Barbara Rosenkranz, presidential candidate in 2010 for Austria’s far-right Freedom Party. Leonhard Foeger / Reuters

The implication is that the Islamic threat is real and urgent; being Muslim and being European is incompatible; Muslims can never be moderate. These writers and their disciples have their viewpoints endlessly repeated in public and reposted on internet message boards, gifting the far right a ‘legitimate’ scapegoat, as well as the arguments and language to spread its message successfully.

Extreme rightwing politicians exploit ‘respectable’ Islamophobia, knowing that a hard line against Europe’s Muslim communities is a surefire vote winner. Across the continent – in Denmark, the Netherlands, Belgium, Sweden, France, Austria, Switzerland – far-right political parties have won large numbers of votes by focusing on the ‘Islamization’ of their countries.

I’ve had enough of Islam in the Netherlands; let not one more Muslim immigrate,’ Geert Wilders proclaims, and his fellow populists agree. The Danish People’s Party publishes posters depicting the Prophet Muhammad, with the Jyllands-Posten cartoons controversy fresh in the public mind. A branch of Austria’s FPÖ released the online computer game ‘Bye Bye Mosque’, in which players were encouraged to target a crude Muslim caricature erecting religious buildings.

Aligned with popular campaigns, such as banning the construction of mosques and minarets or legislating on which garments Muslim women can wear in public – in Wilders’ words, a tax on ‘head-rags’ – far-right voices have been successful in creating a cultural climate that is aggressively hostile to Europe’s Muslim communities.


This atmosphere inevitably leads to physical clashes. Across Europe, Muslim populations have become regular targets of violent attacks. Centres of worship are routinely vandalized – Berlin’s largest mosque, Sehitlik, was attacked four times in five months last year – and women wearing religious clothing are frequently abused and assaulted in public.

Often entire communities are intimidated by anti-Muslim protests that take to the streets. The English Defence League has held 40 marches across Britain in two years, all of which have ended in violence. In the city of Peterborough, supporters circumvented police cordons and attacked Muslim youths after a series of inflammatory speeches. Their actions, which have included daubing mosques with hate-speech and placing bacon and pigs’ heads on Muslim premises, are designed to promote community division and provoke a violent reaction, lending credence to a confused ‘clash of civilizations’ narrative.

Anti-immigrant politicians are channelling the energy of extra-parliamentary movements into their campaigns, organizing meetings with those able to mobilize people previously thought to be beyond the reach of representative politics.

Wilders, with his contacts both within parliaments and outside conventional political structures, is forming an International Freedom Alliance, which aims to ‘stop Islam’ and ‘defend freedom’. Attempts are being made by an opposing alliance to hold Wilders to account. Jeroen Bosch of Dutch anti-racist group Alert! says: ‘Everybody who is attacked by Wilders and his policies resists in their own way – artists make art, judges author opinion articles, others write free pamphlets. People make humorous posters and flyers on the internet, political parties give out research on the voting behaviour of his party and groups like ours monitor their publications and speeches.’


I want to replace the mainstream.’ Kent Ekeroth is clear about what he and other anti-immigrant populists believe they can achieve. ‘I hope we can replace the Social Democrats and all those other naïve parties. Look at Norway and Austria – we have the biggest party. The Front National is the second biggest party in France. In Finland, the second or first biggest.’

A decade after Austria was ostracized, Haider’s successors are being accepted, their agenda adopted by established parties they sit alongside. In the Netherlands and Denmark limits on immigration from Africa and the Middle East can be directly attributed to these parties acting as government ‘support partners’. They drive popular, often successful campaigns to restrict visible signs of Islam in Europe – against the mosque, the Qur’an, the face-veil – often supported by people who would never dream of actively endorsing the far right.

The mainstream, after years of denying these parties the ‘oxygen of publicity’, frequently goes out of its way to accommodate far-right views in order to reflect the diversity of political opinion. Geert Wilders writes for the Wall Street Journal; SD leader Jimmie Åkesson authors a pre-election op-ed for the Swedish tabloid Aftonbladet; Marine Le Pen is winning support on her ‘detoxification’ tour of the globe, granting interviews to Britain’s Daily Telegraph, Israel’s Ha’aretz and the Associated Press – something completely denied to her father.


As their influence grows across the continent, so must their ambitions. Their parties have successfully put ‘natives first’ policies, and even the voluntary repatriation of immigrants, back on to the political agenda, decades after they were last considered seriously by lawmakers.

The social reforms developed by the conservative and social democratic consensus over six decades were in part introduced to ensure that Europe never again saw extremists holding the levers of power. In 21st century Europe, a populist far right sees an opportunity to dismantle institutional, ethical and legislative structures that the continent has built upon since the Second World War. Agreed principles around non-discrimination, tolerance and diversity are under threat by opportunistic figures who care little for the livelihoods of Europe’s minority communities.

As Ekeroth declares: ‘We are not bound by someone else’s principles.’

K Biswas is a writer based in London.

Front cover of New Internationalist magazine, issue 443 This feature was published in the June 2011 issue of New Internationalist. To read more, buy this issue or subscribe.

Never miss another story! Get our FREE fortnightly eNews

Comments on Eyes to the far right

Leave your comment


  • Maximum characters allowed: 5000
  • Simple HTML allowed: bold, italic, and links

Registration is quick and easy. Plus you won’t have to re-type the blurry words to comment!
Register | Login

  1. #1 Peace Activist 29 May 11

    Dear K Biswas and Others,
    Having received my copy of the New Internationalist though the post today, I was delighted to see your article; this magazine has covered this somewhat neglected issue very extensively. I am of the belief that the far right present a real danger to democracy and the world in general. The dynamism of the far right has come from immigration and animosity towards Islam. Whilst some of the more mild supporters perceive the right wing as way of overcoming their general problems; many are involved for excitement and violence. There are various right wing political gangs that offer 'cheap larger' politics to those who have had no previous political ideology or interest in politics before. Even more disturbing is the way various other much more devious individuals and organisations are serving their own surreptitious agendas by becoming ostensibly involved. Whilst I am a great believer in democracy indeed! I believe our democratic system may one day bring us a land slide electoral victory for a right wing 'loony tune' dictatorship of arbitrary arrests, torture and organised anarchy.

  2. #2 Robin Tudge 01 Jun 11

    Mark Steyn - brrr! I remember him from the Daily Telegraph, seriously unsavoury pundit.

  3. #3 Iftikhar 03 Jun 11


    It looks to me you are one of those that do not want Muslims in the West since you see them only as a problem?.

    Just reflect on what you guys in the west have done in other countries.

    Think of Africa and the sub-contiinent in particular. Do you guys really have a reason to complain?. Or are you the elites that always should have it better than anyone else?.

    To be honest, no group of people has damaged the world, other people's societies more than you in the west.

    The Muslims dont want to integrate or abide by western law. Just because they don´t want to wear nude clothes or at least cloth that can show how big her breast are... so these people failed to integrate. Just because they don't like free sex, then these people failed again.. what a dirty Bush mind you have!

    Speaking English does not promote integration into British, American and Australian societies, and broaden opportunities. English speaking Muslim youths are angry, frustrated and extremist, thanks to state schools with monolingual non-Muslim teachers and English language. English language is not only a lingua franca but also lingua frankensteinia. Human right are also covers linguistic right. Cultural and linguistic genocide are very common. British schooling is murdering community languages like Arabic, Urdu and others. English is today the world killer language. Linguistic genocide is a crime against humanity and British schooling is guilty of committing this crime. Language is not just a language. It defines one's culture, identity and consciousness. It defines how we think, communicate and express ourselves. The fact is the most South Asian Muslims have come to know Islam by way of Urdu, the children's alienation from the language that connects them the heritage of their parents and grand parents is disturbing. As a matter of fact, one has to get to know his mother tongue well if one is to master any other language
    Iftikhar Ahmad

  4. #4 9xzulug 03 Jun 11


  5. #5 sepp heydrich 04 Jun 11

    I suppose when you use the term ’far right’ you're referring to anybody who wants to establish white civil rights?

  6. #6 M P Basheer 04 Jun 11

    Can you kindly give me the email id of K Biswas, who authored the piece ’Eyes to the far right’?

    M P Basheer,
    Executive Editor,
    Indiavision Channel

  7. #7 Johnathan 04 Jun 11

    Every day many white and black people all over Europe become Muslims , visit any Mosque and you will see White , Black , Asian. All races. There are a million white Muslims in UK , France and Germany alone. In the UK there are many Muslim MPs , barristers , judges , billionaires , oil rich Arabs quite literally own much of London , the Qatar royal family in particular. Even Jewish and Hindu communities in UK are standing against the EDL , who are nothing more than football hooligans , ask any police officer and he will tell you. Every medical school has Muslims , Every law school has muslims in UK. They will all go on to earn huge salaries , those uneducated whites are jealous and lazy , the chavs - in the council estates. Good old fashioned bigots. The worst part of UK is in fact these types. The politicians know this , the Muslim community in UK is very strong , as is the Indian community and also the African muslim community , and each day they become stronger and more wealthy. The EDL will not achieve much , many are being rounded up for jail , and have criminal records now. They belong in jail. I love living in a multi cultural Britain - and visit Sikh and Hindu temples and am received very well. This is what puts the Great is Great Britain - our diversity.

  8. #8 Roland44 05 Jun 11

    If the left had paid more attention to migration issues,the rise and now firm entrenchment of conservative Islam, and had played it's traditional role of uplifting the ignorant and impoverished masses there wouldn't have been any room for the populist right to exploit.
    What we need is an answer and a solution from the left not a denial of very real problems.Confrontation not appeasement of harmful and wrong behavior based on superstitions.

  9. #9 Handojin 06 Jun 11

    Its very clear that white europeans are not willing to accept non whites as equals and also not leave non white countries in the east and middle east alone, so the only real option teh europeans want is to continue the genocide they astarted in WW2. that is unless white europeans accept their extremism as wrong and needs eradicating, but i guess after teh passing over of palestinian rights they dotn look like they will! new world order !

  10. #10 Handojin 06 Jun 11

    Where are the white people standing up and denouncing this extremism? they have called for muslims to denounce extremism and many have, but most white people are in support of right wing extremists and have a heartless casuality for mass murder, especially if they are proud of ’their boys’ doign the killing for them in planes and humvees!

  11. #11 punk rock old school 06 Jun 11

    @iftikhar I find it confusing that you start your letter by saying that the writer looks to be someone who doesn't want Muslims in the west? That's pretty much the opposite of what he is saying isn't it? To me, this article is a vital piece of work, highlighting the global rise of far right extremism, this article is trying to raise enough concern so that people realise the danger and act to terminate it. How could you have such a misguided view of people who are so clearly in support of you?

    @Handojin again, you seem to be saying that white people are not in support of fighting Islamophobia but surely this article is evidence to the contrary? Why are you criticizing those on your side? Have you ever been to anti-fascist rallies and demonstrations? Do you know how many white people have fought fascism and racism in this country and continue to do so?

    The fight to end fascism and racism is a fight for all people, all ages, all races, all creeds, all languages... in my life as an activist, this much is clear to me. I see it with my own eyes every time the EDL or BNP stagger drunkenly into the streets and find themselves surrounded by the anti-fascist movement.

    @sepp heydrich 'civil rights' are intended for all human beings, it's not a colour coded scheme, which I am sure you would like it to be but then, when you're daughter or son marries someone not white, where will you stand then? When your life is saved by an african doctor or a firefighter who happens to be a muslim, where will you stand then?

    Great article but where is the debate here? Where the thousands of voices in support?

  12. #12 Vicki K 08 Jun 11

    An incredibly educational article for those of us living outside Europe. Though the far-right is behaving similarly wherever you go in the world. It is indeed very alarming for those of us who value tolerance, compassionate and humanity.

  13. #14 mick edl romford 09 Jun 11

    many thanks for using my photo to promote your article regardless of the misleading content within it i do however take issue with the point about my contact lenses being a symbol of white supremacy as they are not, it is a symbol of england and nothing more whether you are black white or green with pink spots the colour of someones skin is not an issue so please stop portraying national pride as racist

  14. #15 Lou 12 Jun 11

    The Muslims dont want to integrate or abide by western law...........
    Speaking English does not promote integration into British, American and Australian societies, and broaden opportunities. English speaking Muslim youths are angry, frustrated and extremist, thanks to state schools with monolingual non-Muslim teachers and English language......................

    Sure, sure, its all OUR fault. Always OUR fault. Why dont you take your angry, frustrated and extremist youth and................go back home where you can be taught in your own language!!

    Thank you, thank you, thank you. You have just OFFICIALLY debunked this article, and confirmed what all the supporters of the Far Right already knew. Muslims are muslims first and always, not citizens of the country in which they reside.

  15. #16 Andrius Ruslan 17 Jun 11

    Fascism not only a political issue - it's foremost an economic one.

    The Austro-Marxist Otto Bauer clearly points out in his theory of fascism, that the far right parties are funded by the Capital to lower wages even further and not to suppress working-class movements. This has already been done by the Capital beforehand.

    How interesting to put it into our context! Thatcher has destroyed the unions, the buying power of the people is frozen since the 1990ies and the living standard goes down. - Yes, and now the rise of fascism!

    Of course, you also need an enemy. Either an outer 9/11 type, or an inner one. The Jew from the 1930ies became the Muslim in the 2030ies - exactly when the pyramid-game called capitalism is crashing again on a world scale. We, the middle class are used again. Propaganda (yes, there are a lot of Göbbels out there) makes us believe that our living standard declines because we have to shuffle money downstream to people weaker than we are.

    This should cover the fact, that we shuffle more money to the rich than to the poor. The debate of saving banks (i.e. saving the capitalists to secure their right of risk-less profit) has not been furthered. The next bubbles are waiting to burst.

    Where are the headlines with the Gini-coefficients showing how much our society is drifting apart? Where is the debate about funding the far right - who are the donors? I Fascism always paired with Capitalism or only in the last stage?

  16. #20 L.Sid 18 Jun 11

    Just reflect at what you Muslims have done in other countries: persecution of christians in Nigeria and Pakistan, Hindu genocide in Bangladesh, persecution of Bahais in Iran, persecution of Buddhists in Afghanistan, etc

  17. #21 Peace Activist 28 Jun 11

    I've read Andrius Ruslan's comment with considerable interest. It gives a good overview of how fascism, is certainly not against the richer and more influential, as such. However the yobbos we have problems with right now; buy their cheap larger out of their own pocket money. I don't think they understand 'finance' or anything like that. I do however believe there are people who do, and are covertly providing indirect support, to serve their own agendas.

  18. #22 vs 29 Jul 11

    very interesting article, especially considering recent events in Norway.

  19. #25 Ineya 08 Jun 12

    @Iftikhar Your comment is embarassing to read and it is exactly people like you who give muslims a bad name. How can you say ’British schooling is murdering community languages’ when English is the native language! If the muslim youth are so angry about having to speak English then why are they living in this country? and before i get called a racist-i am indian! I do think that the media portrays muslims in a negative light however, comments like yours do nothing to help matters.

  20. #26 Maltese 28 Jun 12

    Unless this trend is reversed, Europe is about to see the same horrors it saw in WW2.

    In Greece, Golden Dawn activists regularly beat immigrants, leftists and journalists, many times with impunity. In Germany, neo-Nazis already have at least one ’Liberated Zone’, free from immigrants and leftists. A state within a state. Once again, with impunity

    And now these people, who hate democracy, have friends in National Parliaments.

    Mayve, if we're lucky, there will be no gas chambers.

Subscribe to Comments for this articleArticle Comment Feed RSS 2.0

Guidelines: Please be respectful of others when posting your reply.

Get our free fortnightly eNews


Videos from visionOntv’s globalviews channel.

Related articles

Recently in Features

All Features

Popular tags

All tags

This article was originally published in issue 443

New Internationalist Magazine issue 443
Issue 443

More articles from this issue

New Internationalist Magazine Issue 436

If you would like to know something about what's actually going on, rather than what people would like you to think was going on, then read the New Internationalist.

– Emma Thompson –

A subscription to suit you

Save money with a digital subscription. Give a gift subscription that will last all year. Or get yourself a free trial to New Internationalist. See our choice of offers.