New Internationalist

The indivisible I

Issue 400

Indian queer activist Gautam Bhan on why sexuality rights need to be viewed in a different light.

Vijaya is a hijra (a member of India’s traditional transgendered communities) who lives in an urban slum on the outskirts of New Delhi. She can’t get a public ration card that would entitle her to subsidized food because all her documents identify her as male.

Faisal lives in a working class Muslim neighbourhood, is married to a woman, does not speak English or use the word ‘gay’, though he sleeps with men.

I am a Hindu, a privileged, gay man who calls himself queer.

Three different people; three ways of looking at sexuality. But what are gay rights, queer rights, sexuality rights, or sexual rights? Are they simply the right to express and not be criminalized for same-sex desire; or are they the rights of same-sex desiring people, rights that seek to describe and understand all parts of their lives and not just their sexual preference?

In parts of newly emerging sexuality movements in India there is today a shift in ways of articulating the politics of sexuality. This shift recognizes that the way sexuality is experienced by queer people cannot be understood if it is separated from gender, religion, language, region, caste and class.

Vijaya, Faisal and I are on a spectrum of the diversity of queer lives in India. Vijaya’s experience of her gender identity and sexuality is critically shaped by her class, her struggle for survival and vice versa. To her, gender and sexuality are about the public distribution of food and labour rights. To Faisal, sexuality rights include the protection of religious minorities. Gay rights as they have been traditionally understood in the West – as self-identified LGBT communities demanding the right to individual self-expression and non-discrimination – will only go so far in India. It is imperative that we understand how the multiple identities that all Indians possess are connected to each other, and that any politics that seeks to see one in isolation – or to see one struggle as somehow more important than another – will fail.

This first appeared in our award-winning magazine - to read more, subscribe from just £7

Comments on The indivisible I

Leave your comment


  • Maximum characters allowed: 5000
  • Simple HTML allowed: bold, italic, and links

Registration is quick and easy. Plus you won’t have to re-type the blurry words to comment!
Register | Login

...And all is quiet.

Subscribe to Comments for this articleArticle Comment Feed RSS 2.0

Guidelines: Please be respectful of others when posting your reply.

This article was originally published in issue 400

New Internationalist Magazine issue 400
Issue 400

More articles from this issue

  • Karl Rove

    May 1, 2007

    The Darth Vader of US elections

  • Segu Blue

    May 1, 2007

    West African Bassekou Kouyate and Mali’s first traditional lute quartet

  • Revenge

    May 1, 2007

    Luis Enrique Mejía Godoy’s song of reconciliation.

New Internationalist Magazine Issue 436

If you would like to know something about what's actually going on, rather than what people would like you to think was going on, then read the New Internationalist.

– Emma Thompson –

A subscription to suit you

Save money with a digital subscription. Give a gift subscription that will last all year. Or get yourself a free trial to New Internationalist. See our choice of offers.