New Internationalist

Enough already

Issue 356

On 1 January 2004 it will be 10 years since Mexico joined the North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA) - and the Zapatista uprising began in Chiapas. Duncan Green reviews the experience.

If any country in Latin America stood to gain from a trade agreement with the US it was Mexico, with its common border offering ease of transport and attractive opportunities for US investors. NAFTA has indeed benefited some groups within Mexico - especially the big export companies - but it has hurt many more. Despite respectable growth figures and an export boom, real industrial wages have fallen. The percentage of the population below the poverty line remains stubbornly high, especially in the countryside.

Mexican social movements such as the influential Mexican Network on Free Trade1 are now fanning out across the continent, telling their story and campaigning hard to prevent the next phase of the expansion of the free-trade juggernaut.

In 1990 Bush senior announced a grand plan for a free-trade zone ‘stretching from the port of Anchorage to Tierra del Fuego’ - while, naturally, excluding Cuba. Thirteen years later Bush the younger is hoping to finish the job. In theory, agreement should be reached by January 2005.

Washington believes it can get a better deal from the FTAA - without the opposition it faces at the World Trade Organization. In 1994 the First Summit of the Americas in Miami launched the talks undisturbed by protesters. By 1997 opposition was starting to build, with FTAA events increasingly shadowed by civil-society parallel meetings and marches, peaking in Quebec City in April 2001.

Protest continues to build. Much of it is led by the Hemispheric Social Alliance2, a continent-wide network of NGOs and trades unions. Its well-drafted Alternatives for the Americas sets out proposals across the whole spectrum of economic, political and social issues.

Two key themes run through the document: the need to subordinate economic policies to broader social and environmental goals, and to defend national sovereignty against encroachment by unaccountable bodies.

The hopes of opponents rest with Brazil. A plebiscite there in 2002 recorded an extraordinary 10 million votes against the FTAA, with only 113,000 in favour. During his election campaign Lula described it as an ‘annexation project’.

Duncan Green is a policy analyst at CAFOD, the Catholic aid agency. The second edition of his book Silent Revolution: The Rise and Crisis of Market Economics in Latin America is published this autumn by the Latin America Bureau, London.


This first appeared in our award-winning magazine - to read more, subscribe from just £7

Comments on Enough already

Leave your comment


  • Maximum characters allowed: 5000
  • Simple HTML allowed: bold, italic, and links

Registration is quick and easy. Plus you won’t have to re-type the blurry words to comment!
Register | Login

...And all is quiet.

Subscribe to Comments for this articleArticle Comment Feed RSS 2.0

Guidelines: Please be respectful of others when posting your reply.

This article was originally published in issue 356

New Internationalist Magazine issue 356
Issue 356

More articles from this issue

  • Spirit of solidarity

    May 1, 2003

    The spectacular economic collapse has deflated the sense of superiority that Argentina's relative wealth once gave many of its people.

  • The tick and the time bomb

    May 1, 2003

    Michael McCaughan disentangles an explosive mix in Venezuela.

  • In memory of Iraq

    May 1, 2003

    Felicity Arbuthnot recalls the doomed buildings of the country she loves.

New Internationalist Magazine Issue 436

If you would like to know something about what's actually going on, rather than what people would like you to think was going on, then read the New Internationalist.

– Emma Thompson –

A subscription to suit you

Save money with a digital subscription. Give a gift subscription that will last all year. Or get yourself a free trial to New Internationalist. See our choice of offers.