New Internationalist

Power splurge

Issue 355

In May 2001 Philippines President Gloria Macapagal-Arroyo signed into law the Electricity Power Industry Reform Act (EPIRA). President Arroyo promised to bring down electricity rates by breaking up the state-owned National Power Corporation. The NPC monopoly would be chopped up, she proclaimed, and sold to the private sector. The bill was initially introduced in 1997. But a vigorous campaign by the broad-based Filipino Freedom from Debt Coalition (FDC) slowed down its passage – even though the pro-privatization lobby said the bill was ‘too technical’ for non-experts.

In the end, however, the NGO group couldn’t overcome the influence of the powerful energy lobby – a motley crew of élite business groups, transnational power companies, corrupt politicians, government bureaucrats and officials from the IMF and the Asian Development Bank (ADB). In 2000 the IMF and the ADB threatened to withhold credits worth nearly a billion dollars unless the bill was given the green light. And more than one pay-off was made to persuade legislators to pass it. Two opposition politicians confessed to receiving $10,000 pay-offs under the previous Estrada Government. But no matter, those in power – including the IMF and the ADB – turned a deaf ear. The bill had to pass, despite blatant corruption and protests from consumers that it would do nothing to lower electricity prices.

The Freedom from Debt Coalition made it clear that Filipino consumers were being squeezed to bail out private power producers. The group was among the first to show the connection between sky-high electricity rates (second only to Japan in Asia) and the previously murky world of Power Purchase Agreements (PPAs).

The IMF threatened to withhold credits worth nearly a billion dollars...

In order to attract investors to build new power plants (under pressure from the World Bank and others) the Government guaranteed a market at a set price for any new capacity. The state-owned National Power Corporation was obliged to pay private producers in US dollars for the power they generated – whether or not there was a market for it. In effect state guarantees underwrote private investment. Today Filipino consumers pay a special PPA ‘adjustment’ on top of their normal power bills which sometimes totals half the bill. And the recent legislation, which privatizes the state distribution system, does not privatize the associated debt. Filipino taxpayers will continue to shoulder that burden.

The Freedom from Debt Coalition for its part is demanding a ‘democratization of ownership’ of the power sector. Consumers, the group says, should be given the opportunity to own generation and transmission facilities. After all, consumers have been the real source of capital and they’ve been stuck with the PPA debt. Public ownership would also break the monopoly hold of a few families and prevent concentration of ownership by foreign companies.

The Arroyo Government says privatization will take time to work, so consumers must be patient. But Filipinos are rightly suspicious. They could be paying the price of this blind faith for some time to come.

Maitet Diokno-Pascual is a Filipina economist and former president of the Freedom from Debt Coalition, 34 Matiaga St, Central District, Quezon City, Philippines.

This first appeared in our award-winning magazine - to read more, subscribe from just £7

Comments on Power splurge

Leave your comment


  • Maximum characters allowed: 5000
  • Simple HTML allowed: bold, italic, and links

Registration is quick and easy. Plus you won’t have to re-type the blurry words to comment!
Register | Login

...And all is quiet.

Subscribe to Comments for this articleArticle Comment Feed RSS 2.0

Guidelines: Please be respectful of others when posting your reply.

This article was originally published in issue 355

New Internationalist Magazine issue 355
Issue 355

More articles from this issue

  • Bad Medicine

    April 1, 2003

    Britain’s vaunted National Health Service is reeling, hammered by lack of funding and government bumbling. But privatizing the system is not the answer, argues Allyson Pollock. GATS Attacks!

  • I shop, therefore I am

    April 1, 2003

    Has the narcissism of the market destroyed our sense of collective identity? Psychiatrist Trevor Turner argues that a preoccupation with self has spawned a new syndrome: malignant self-actualization.

  • Gats Attacks

    April 1, 2003

    Evil invaders from another planet blast our precious public services. Illustration by Polyp.

New Internationalist Magazine Issue 436

If you would like to know something about what's actually going on, rather than what people would like you to think was going on, then read the New Internationalist.

– Emma Thompson –

A subscription to suit you

Save money with a digital subscription. Give a gift subscription that will last all year. Or get yourself a free trial to New Internationalist. See our choice of offers.