Sisters Are Tapping It For Themselves
New Internationalist 352
December 2002
Get it Right! / PARTICIPATE EQUALLY
Upile Ajibu walks gracefully to her mud-and-thatch hut balancing a tin pail of water on her head. This is the fifth the 33-year-old mother of four has drawn today. 'We normally use only two pails but I keep the others just in case,' she says. That is, in case her water supply dries up, as it sometimes does. Even here, next to Africa's third-largest lake - one of the last surviving freshwater lakes in the world. Ajibu says her family only uses the lake water for bathing, washing and resealing her mud floor. 'The water in the lake is not safe,' she says. 'You can get cholera and other diseases.' Ajibu should know: she is a member of the influential Village Development Committee (VDC) of Mangochi district, about 200 kilometres from Malawi's commercial capital, Blantyre. Advert The Village Development Committee looks after all development issues in the district but women dominate the water committee. 'Everything to do with water safety they leave to us,' says Ajibu proudly. This, albeit on a small scale, is a significant elevation of women's status in a society where women still play second fiddle to men. For instance, in Malawi's national parliament today there are only five women in President Bakili Muluzi's thirty-nine member Cabinet. Of 193 parliamentarians, only 17 are women. And the reason for this turn-around in traditional decision-making power? In 1981 the United Nations Capital Development Fund (UNCDF) launched a project to assist Malawi's low-income earners acquire safe drinking water. The Urban Communal Water Point Project was aimed at constructing 600 communal water points for about 4,000 low-income households in 50 selected urban centres throughout the country. Dr Mekki Mtewa, a US-trained social scientist and legislator for the Mangochi area, explains that in all the tap committees men dominated despite being traditionally only end users of water. The result? 'Almost all the projects flopped because the men just did not care where their women got the water,' he recalls. The taps were not properly maintained. Most men even refused to give their wives - most of whom do not have paid work - the token contribution fees for water maintenance that the committees prescribed. A serious review of the project was carried out in 1988 where stakeholders (most of them men) conceded that the project had failed because women - who are the main water users - were sidelined. 'A national decision was adopted then to include more women in key positions and keep the men in more advisory technical roles,' said Dr Mtewa. It was thought to be important not to banish men completely from the committees because most women in Malawi are not educated. More than twice as many men can read as women. But Upile Ajibu of the Mangochi VDC is semi-literate herself and that does not stop her from making decisions about water. 'One does not have to go to school to know that unclean water breeds diseases like cholera,' she says tongue-in-cheek.
Although this turn-around happened nearly 15 years ago, its effects have been lasting - even though Ajibu has never actually heard of the UNCDF-sponsored Urban Communal Water Point Project. Her committee controls water supply projects sponsored by the World Bank-funded Malawi Social Action Fund (MASAF). In place since the year 2000, it has a male supervisor but nine of the twelve members are women. 'Men and boys do not draw water,' she says, 'so they have no business dominating water committees.' Advert As for the men, they seem to have taken everything in their stride. George Masauko is one of three men on the committee. 'We men are called in when there is a fault, otherwise the daily running of the project is in their (women's) hands,' he says. In the Mangochi district - largely a Muslim dominated area - men still make all the major decisions. The water committees should slowly help to change all that. Recently, the Southern Africa Development Community (SADC) - a 14-member economic bloc along the lines of the European Union (EU) - agreed that all decision-making bodies in Southern Africa should have at least 30-per-cent or more women. Looking at the success of the Mangochi women-dominated water committee, local MP Dr Mtewa is so impressed that he intends to review the composition of other development committees in his constituency. 'We want more women on other committees as well, even if their core duty is not directly to do with all-women issues.' This attitude prevails even though the water system nearly collapsed during the famine that gripped the country between December 2001 and March 2002. Faults developed, people started drinking from the lake and the communities experienced the worst cholera attacks for years. The people of Mangochi do not blame the water committees. They understand that the energy of everyone during that time had to be redirected towards gathering food to stave off starvation. So the confidence that the community has in the water committees remains intact. Ajibu says some of the decisions left for men to make about water projects are now largely symbolic. 'We might hold elections soon but really that depends on the chief,' she says. As I bid her farewell, Ajibu is being called to an urgent meeting at the VDC. A young man was caught during the night urinating near one of the taps in the committee's jurisdiction. She has to be party to deciding the young man's fate. 'It depends on the age of the offender,' she tells me. 'If he is young, his parents pay a fine and he cleans his mess, but if he is old and probably drunk we refer him to the chief who can fine him a goat.'
|
© Copyright 2002 New Internationalist Publications Ltd. All rights reserved. |
This article is from
the December 2002 issue
of New Internationalist.
- Discover unique global perspectives
- Support cutting-edge independent media
- Magazine delivered to your door or inbox
- Digital archive of over 500 issues
- Fund in-depth, high quality journalism