New Internationalist

Simply… Manufacturing Consent.

October 1992

new internationalist
issue 236 - October 1992

simply Manufacturing consent
Our opinions depend upon the information we get. Western leaders still believe that a 'free press' undermined public support and lost the Vietnam War for America - they call it the 'Vietnam Syndrome'. The US invasions of Grenada and Panama were dummy runs for a different kind of war - a media war to control information and enlist public support. Desert Storm was the real thing - and it worked. Opinion polls showed 'approval ratings' for the War as high as 90 per cent in North America and Europe. Here are some of the ways it was done.

Military briefings gave the impression that high-tech weapons 'took out' Iraqi hardware in a 'clean, dehumanized War fought between military machines rather than people. Meanwhile on the ground Iraqi soldiers were being massacred.

The Western media demonized Saddam Hussein and likened him to 'a modern Hitler. But for years, despite the evidence of its human-rights abuses, the Iraqi Government had been sponsored by the West and its Gulf State allies like Saudi Arabia in the war against Iran.

When the Iraqis opened the valves on Kuwaiti oil wells and created an oil slick in the Gulf, pictures of oil-covered birds immediately appeared in the media. But this pollution resulted from earlier incidents - including the bombing of Iraqi tankers by US planes. Both sides were oblivious to environmental concerns.

Western leaders played up the size arid strength of the Iraqi army, claiming that it contained one million men equipped with sophisticated weaponry arid battle-hardened by the war with Iran. What actually confronted Desert Storm was a rag-tag army made up of ill-equipped conscripts who were virtually defenceless against Coalition bombardment.

Military commanders organized a tightly - controlled pool system for selected reporters whose material was censored and then made available to other journalists - who often reported the war from hotels in Saudi Arabia. Very few pictures of the actual fighting ever appeared.

'Precision' bombing and guided 'smart' weapons were said to be able to distinguish between military arid civilian targets arid avoid non-combatant casualties. But only seven per cent of the bombs dropped were 'smart'. Civilian targets were hit regularly and thousands of civilians were killed.

previous page choose a different magazine go to the contents page go to the NI home page next page

This feature was published in the October 1992 issue of New Internationalist. To read more, buy this issue or subscribe.

Never miss another story! Get our FREE fortnightly eNews

Comments on Simply... Manufacturing Consent.

Leave your comment


  • Maximum characters allowed: 5000
  • Simple HTML allowed: bold, italic, and links

Registration is quick and easy. Plus you won’t have to re-type the blurry words to comment!
Register | Login

...And all is quiet.

Subscribe to Comments for this articleArticle Comment Feed RSS 2.0

Guidelines: Please be respectful of others when posting your reply.

Get our free fortnightly eNews


Videos from visionOntv’s globalviews channel.

Related articles

Recently in Features

All Features

Popular tags

All tags

This article was originally published in issue 236

More articles from this issue

New Internationalist Magazine Issue 436

If you would like to know something about what's actually going on, rather than what people would like you to think was going on, then read the New Internationalist.

– Emma Thompson –

A subscription to suit you

Save money with a digital subscription. Give a gift subscription that will last all year. Or get yourself a free trial to New Internationalist. See our choice of offers.