Aotearoa/New Zealand

Click here to subscribe to the print edition. [image, unknown] new internationalist 142[image, unknown] [image, unknown] [image, unknown] December 1984[image, unknown] Click here to search the mega index.

[image, unknown] UP-DATE

[image, unknown]

[image, unknown]

New information on subjects covered in previous issues of the New Internationalist

Binders and complete sets of back issues are
available from our on-line shopping site here.

[image, unknown]

[image, unknown] NUCLEAR DISARMAMENT[image, unknown]

Dumping the Bomb
South Pacific moves to become a nuclear-free zone

THE South Pacific is now taking firm steps towards becoming a vast nuclear-free zone. This follows the election in New Zealand of a Labor government committed to an anti-nuclear foreign policy.

New Prime Minister David Lange’s campaign has already taken him to the US and the United Nations but he faced his first serious diplomacy test in the remote South Pacific nation of Tuvalu. On the tiny atoll of Funafuti he dealt with an agenda full of potentially explosive issues for the South Pacific Forum - topped by proposals for a nuclear-free Pacific.

The cornerstone of New Zealand’s nuclear-free politics rests on the ruling Labor Party’s refusal to accept visits by nuclear-armed or-powered warships, such as from the US. However, Australian Prime Minister Bob Hawke is opposed to this policy, both in the Anzus defence treaty between Australia, New Zealand and the US, and in the Forum region.

In the two-day Forum conference, the strongly anti-nuclear Vanuatu, plus Papua New Guinea and the Solomon Islands, backed New Zealand while Fiji and the Polynesian nations gave their support to Australia.

Already the Reagan administration is troubled by New Zealand’s ban on visits by nuclear warships. Now it has to face the dilemma of Forum nations deciding to ‘neutralise’ themselves from a nuclear deterrent, apart from visits by friendly warships.

The moves are bound to help the antinuclear campaigns of small countries like Belau and the Marshall Islands which face severe pressure by the US over military demands. Kwajalein atoll, in the Marshalls, for example, is a vital US missile-testing range.

In 1979 Belau adopted a constitution that bans the storage, testing and disposal of nuclear weapons within its territory without approval of 75 per cent of the votes cast in a referendum. It was the first such nuclear-free constitution declared by any nation in the world.

New Zealand is also gradually becoming a nuclear-free zone. By May 1984 more than two-thirds of the country’s 3.2 million population lived in 68 symbolic nuclear free zones declared by local town and county councils - including many of the key cities. Although Lange failed to gain immediate support from the Forum for his call to seek UN endorsement of a nuclear-free Pacific, he raised the issue himself when he addressed the UN General Assembly in September.

The Americans have given the Lange administration a six-month breathing space with no ship visits while the issue is being discussed.

David Robie, Gemini

Click image to enlarge.
Click map to enlarge

[image, unknown]

[image, unknown] RACISM[image, unknown]

Downtrodden dogs
Origins of racism - a fable

MANY years ago the intrepid Topdogs set out from Dogland and discovered Antarctica. The aboriginal inhabitants (Penguins) did not survive the invasion and this left the Topdogs with a problem: how to catch their favourite dogfish to ship home. The solution was to enslave dogs from Dalmatia to dive into the icy water and do the fishing for them.

When circumstances changed, and some of the descendants of these Dalmatians managed to leave Antarctica and emigrate to Dogland, the Topdogs greeted them as ‘Penguins’, treated them as Penguins, expected them to behave like Penguins. There had been much raping of Dalmatian bitches by Topdogs, so that some of the present generation were not noticeably spotty. However, even the suspicion of a Dalmatian ancestor was enough to brand anyone a ‘Penguin’.

Topdog religion extolled ‘A she-dog unspotted’ and spoke of an Incaninate Deity ‘without spot or blemish’. However much their theologians protested that these expressions were purely metaphorical, it was hard for the more simple-minded, whether Topdogs or Dalmatians, to avoid identifying Dalmatian spottiness with ‘blemish’ and thinking of spotless Topdogs as ipso facto superior.

Not all Topdogs were unfriendly. Many did their best to be helpful. They provided swimming pools (‘all Penguins love the water’), and puppies flocked to hear Dalmatian choruses bay the moon (‘they have such long nights in Antarctica!’).

The immigrant Dalmatians took little notice of all this. A few made it in Topdog society - first class swimmers, moonbayers and so on, mostly. The mass of them congregated in overcrowded kennels, whence only the brightest and boldest would venture to mingle with Topdogs and seek work in their society.

How are the Topdogs going to find out that the ‘Penguins’ are not a strange species, but fellow canines, with remarkably similar needs and feelings to their own? And how long will the Dalmatians be willing to believe the same of the Topdogs?

Jennifer Sprague

This is a suggested revision of Chris Gaine’s fable ‘Oppressed penguins’ which appeared in NI 138.

[image, unknown]

[image, unknown] AID[image, unknown]

Swinging right
Canada’s new aid policy

THE election of a Conservative government in Canada has provoked fears of a new harder line on foreign policy and aid.

The Conservatives won their first majority since 1958 largely on the basis of a moderate ‘centrist’ campaign. The fear of development groups is that the Government will start drifting to the right on foreign policy and aid in an attempt to improve relations with the US.

Within the first week of choosing the cabinet, the Mulroney government seemed to say a number of different things simultaneously. Michael Wilson, the new Finance Minister, made headlines at the Commonwealth Finance Ministers meeting by siding with Britain and the US on the controversial issue of rescheduling Third World debts on a case-by-case basis. This hard line against debtors is a switch from Trudeau’s desire to find a formula which would help Third World debtor nations.

At the same time, however, the appointment of Joe Clark to External Affairs was broadly interpreted as a sign that Canada would be maintaining its international commitments for aid and Third World development.

In the Non-Governmental Aid community, there is a cautious optimism about the appointment of Clark, who has announced a freeze on the funding of CIDA (Canadian International Development Agency) until a full review of Canada’s foreign aid policy is made. The agency handles most of the funds for Canadian bilateral and mutilateral aid, as well as funding all NGOs (Non-Governmental Organisations).

Any cutbacks or reductions will most likely occur in the area of bilateral aid.

Optimistic scenarios aside, it seems that the future of Canadian foreign aid policy hinges on the capacity of Mulroney to improve relations with the United States without giving in to pressure to the American line. Is this possible? Time will tell.

Steve Schildroth

[image, unknown]

[image, unknown] DRUGS[image, unknown]

Double dealing
Western companies push hazardous products to poor

Drugs which have been withdrawn in the West continue to be widely used in developing countries, where drug control regulations are generally weak. There is also new evidence that pharmaceutical companies are using double standards in the labelling and marketing of their products in the Third World.

Two recent examples are the painkillers, phenylbutazone and oxyphenbutazone, which are given mainly to arthritis sufferers and can cause life-threatening blood disorders, gastro-intestinal bleeding and ulceration. leukaemia and the Steven-Johnson Syndrome.

Nearly 1,200 people in the world have died from ailments caused by these drugs, according to information from an internal report of Ciba Geigy, the largest producer of pain killers. Over 10,000 people have also been reported to have suffered serious side effects.

Following the leaking of the Ciba Geigy report earlier this year, many governments acted to ban or heavily restrict the two drugs. The UK government withdrew phenylbutazone from general use in March this year. and Ciba Geigy withdrew oxyphenbutazone completely a month later. The two drugs have also been banned in Norway and Bangladesh.

However, the new information and debate about the toxicity of the two painkillers does not seem to be well known in most developing countries. As a result, doctors in these countries are still widely prescribing the two drugs to their patients.

The situation is made worse by the double standards of the drug companies, which were revealed in a detailed study by the Consumers’ Association of Penang (CAP), the leading Malaysian consumer organisation. CAP found that in Europe and the US the drug companies provide detailed information warning doctors against giving the drugs for minor ailments or for use in young children and the elderly. Doctors are told to use the drugs only for short-term treatment of severe rheumatic disorders and acute gout.

But in Third World countries the same companies recommend the drugs for minor ailments. For example, in Malaysia they are recommended for ‘pain and stiffness in muscles and joints, lumbago, tension headache’, even ‘virus infections and fever’ and for ‘long-term treatment CAP quoted the case of a university lecturer who almost died after his doctor gave him phenylbutazone to treat a stiff neck.

The current debate on the safety of the two painkillers is significant in view of the resolution taken at the United Nations World Health Assembly held in May, calling for unbiased and complete drug information to be made available to developing countries.

Developing countries which already have limited funds available for the provision of adequate primary health care to their people should not be spending too much on unnecessary and, worse, dangerous drugs.

Teh Poh Ai

[image, unknown]

[image, unknown] HEALTH[image, unknown]

Doctoring danger
Filipino health workers killed by military

WHEN a repressive government is challenged by an increasingly popular guerilla movement the crackdown can be savage. In the Philippines, where the vicious Marcos regime is being threatened by the Communist New People’s Army, among the casualties are primary health care workers killed by the military.

Health care in the Philippines is in a dreadful state. The country trains 2,000 doctors each year - but 65 per cent of them leave to work in richer countries, mainly the US and the Middle East. Even more nurses emigrate - 88 percent of the 10,000 trained every year, which makes the Philippines the world’s largest exporter of nursing staff.

Even those who remain prefer to work in cities like Manila, which leads to severe neglect of the rural areas. This is not difficult to understand - the medical training they receive equips them to work in a Western-type hospital rather than in villages where drugs are not seen from one year to the next.

This has meant that the only effective medical care away from the cities has been provided through Christian organisations - particularly those staffed by priests preaching ‘liberation theology’ as in Latin America. Doctors working in the southernmost island of Mindanao, where the guerillas are strongest, have been putting their efforts into training people from small rural communities in the primary health care techniques which will prevent 80 per cent of all disease-related problems.

They have also found, according to one Filipino doctor, that this health education must go hand in hand with political education. ‘We preach nutrition and sanitation,’ he said, ‘but if people do not own the land, how can they grow the right crops or build toilets?’

The doctors’ political approach inevitably entails great danger. The military regard it as subversive and regularly detain health workers and doctors for questioning. Merely the suspicion of treating guerillas can land health workers in prison or even cost them their lives.

In April 1982 a doctor was killed by the military in his clinic on the island of Samar. The protest of international solidarity and human rights organisations led to the release of another doctor who had been detained for a year. But while pressure from abroad can help doctors who are victimized, the anonymous local health workers have no such protection according to the latest reports, at least three were killed by the military in 1983 and another five this year.

‘Things can only get worse, said the doctor. ‘Wish us luck.’

[image, unknown]

[image, unknown] TAKING ISSUE

Ashok Mitra

Ashok Mitra's monthly column looks at the procreation of the poor.

Should Kalidasi have another?

The cocktail crowd is much exercised. The net rate of growth of population refuses to come down and the country is in a jam. This does not prevent the accumulation of huge wealth and income in the hands of the top people. The cocktail crowd nonetheless remains agitated. For the milieu is spoiled.

Once the overall income growth remains poor and concentration at the top increases, squalor and poverty expand, absolutely as much as proportionately. You build your luxury penthouses and sky-scraping hotels, lay out tennis lawns and golf courses, invest in country farms and weekend beach shacks, have cocktail occasions for five evenings out of seven. But the squalor haunts you. There is something ugly and non-aesthetic in dirt and misery. The pestilential poor, who hem you in, exasperate you. You know where precisely the remedy lies: in cutting down ruthlessly the rate of reproduction in poor families. You must zero in on the rate of birth amongst the poor, who breed like rats. In the cocktail circuit the conclusion is near-unanimous. Campaigns and advertisements are pretty useless. The poor are not impressed,the poor have a quaint theory regarding children. Additional babies are for them extra hands to beg or scrounge with. Since they do not understand, will not understand, are incapable of understanding, there is only one way out: compulsory vasectomy and tubectomy. Perhaps a cash inventive may be considered.

Cut. Now cross over to Kalidasi Santra, who has five kids and expecting another one. She has an unemployed husband who loafs around either in the union office or in the tea stalls. Kalidasi has to fend for the family. She does chores every morning and evening, in different households in the neighbourhood, combining in herself the functions of charwoman, dustman and cook. She cleans the dishes and utensils left over from the meals, sweeps the floors, dusts the furniture and on occasion cooks the meals. It is a hectic pace, for between five-thirty in the morning and noon,she must do the rounds in half-a-dozen households and repeat them for another set of six houses between six and nine in the evening. On the average each household pays her between 1 5 to 20 rupees, adding up to roughly 200 rupees per month. She could not however have done the chores in twelve households if she did not have in tow her five children, ranging in age from thirteen to two.

The three elder children, all daughters, join her in dusting the rooms, polishing the furniture and cleaning the utensils and dishes. The senior one even helps her with the cooking. The fourth child, who too is a daughter and is barely six, looks after the fifth offspring, a son,and engages him in play, while the rest of the family are at work. There could hardly be a more pristine example of division of labour, which provides the chance for specialisation too. Specialisation speeds up the work. It also improves efficiency, and enables Kalidasi to do her twelve houses with clockwork precision.

The talk at tbe cocktail circuit will not impress Kalidasi. She knows that, without her children, she would be at her wit’s end. The children are her cobreadwinners, while the husband tries to organise the workers laid off as a result of the lock-out in the local factory. The owner of the plant is a leading luminary of the cocktail circuit. He shut it down because the workers were demanding higher wages. To concede the demand for higherwages is to spoil the market for labour. Even his fellow entrepreneurs urged him to stand firm. In any case, he does not forthe present lose much by closing the plant. He is in a sellers’ market, and has two other plants producing the same products in a neighbouring town; the relative shortage has led to a hike in price, and more than compensated him . Kalidasi feels the pinch and is in need of earning extra money. She does some long-range planning in her own manner. She conceives another child, who might help her in due course to add one or two households to her schedule of work.

The gentlemen-proprietors in the cocktail circuit will not appreciate Kalidasi’s rationale, just as she does not theirs. Parallel lines do not meet.

Ashok Mitra is Finance Minister in the state government of West Bengal, India.

Previous page.
Choose another issue of NI.
Go to the contents page.
Go to the NI home page.
Next page.

Subscribe   Ethical Shop