New Internationalist

Questions to ask about an aid project

December 1979

Despite all good intentions, massive government-to-government aid just doesn’t seem to be able to reach the poorest of the poor in the Third World. However, small-scale projects aimed at correcting underlying inequalities can be successful. But what criteria do we use to evaluate such aid?

Here, the San Francisco-based Institute for Food and Development Policy raises eight key questions for judging aid projects. On the following three pages we look at two projects that come close to fulfilling the criteria. Flora Moon explains why the Bangladesh Rural Advancement Committee has enjoyed success and acceptance and Steve Seaborn reports on a Botswana weaving cooperative that challenges some traditional barriers.

1 Whose project IS it? Is it the donor agency’s? OR Does it originate with the people involved.

2 Does the project define the problem as a technical or physical deficiency (e.g. poor farming methods or depleted soils) that can be overcome with the right technique and skills? OR Does it first tackle the under­lying social, economic and political constraints that stand in the way of solving the physical or technical problem?

3 Does the project strengthen the economic and political position of a certain group, creating a more prosperous enclave which then becomes resistant to any change that might abolish its privileges? OR Does it generate a shift in power to the powerless?

4 Does the project focus only on the needs of individuals? OR Does it help individuals who are now powerless to see their common interest with others and so lead to unified efforts through which cooperative strength is built?

5 Does the project merely help individuals adjust to their exploitation by such external forces as the national government or the international market? OR Does it encourage an understanding of that exploitation and a resistance to it?

6 Does the project, through the intervention of outside experts, take away local initiative? OR Does it generate a process of democratic decision-making and a thrust toward self-reliance that can carry over to future projects?

7 Does the project reinforce dependence on outside sources of material and skills OR Does it use local ingenuity, local labour and local materials, and can it be maintained with local skills?

8 Will success only be measured by the achievement of the pre-set plans of outsiders? OR Is the project open­ended, with success measured by the local people as the project progresses?

The first critical measure of an effective development project is whether the outside agency sees its role as going into the Third World to set things right. Or does it see itself as a supporter of local people who are already doing something to help themselves? The role of Western sympathisers is not to start the train moving but to remove the obstacles in its way especially those originating in our own countries. We can provide some fuel for the train too - if it's needed.

The approach a voluntary agency takes will depend on the nature of the host government. In Third World countries allowing freedom of move­ment and speech, it's possible to work through legal organisations. When the government is itself an active and central part of the redistribution of resources and power, it is possible to work directly with the government. In most countries, however, where the government is brutally repressing movements for change, it is necessary to work discreetly, supporting directly local efforts to build alternatives.

This feature was published in the December 1979 issue of New Internationalist. To read more, buy this issue or subscribe.

Never miss another story! Get our FREE fortnightly eNews

Comments on Questions to ask about an aid project

Leave your comment







 

  • Maximum characters allowed: 5000
  • Simple HTML allowed: bold, italic, and links

Registration is quick and easy. Plus you won’t have to re-type the blurry words to comment!
Register | Login

...And all is quiet.

Subscribe to Comments for this articleArticle Comment Feed RSS 2.0

Guidelines: Please be respectful of others when posting your reply.

Get our free fortnightly eNews

Multimedia

Videos from visionOntv’s globalviews channel.

Related articles

Recently in Features

All Features

Popular tags

All tags

This article was originally published in issue 082

New Internationalist Magazine issue 082
Issue 082

More articles from this issue

  • Foreign Aid - the facts

    December 1, 1979

    The reasons for giving foreign aid are usually couched in humanitarian language. Our governments contribute food, technical advice, cash loans and grants because they are ostensibly interested in improving the lot of the world's poor. But the actual impulses behind foreign aid are far more complex. Here the New Internationalist cuts through the jargon of aid and comments briefly on the aid policies of some of the more important donor nations.

  • Going it alone in Botswana

    December 1, 1979

    STEVE SEABORN reports on a Botswana weaving coop­erative aimed at building self-reliance.

  • Foreign Aid builds a New Trojan Horse

    December 1, 1979

    Robert Carty examines the emphasis on increased agricultural productivity and finds the ultimate winners are middle-class farmers and Western agribusiness firms.

New Internationalist Magazine Issue 436

If you would like to know something about what's actually going on, rather than what people would like you to think was going on, then read the New Internationalist.

– Emma Thompson –

A subscription to suit you

Save money with a digital subscription. Give a gift subscription that will last all year. Or get yourself a free trial to New Internationalist. See our choice of offers.

Subscribe