New Internationalist

Trademark travesty

Issue 405

In a brilliant PR move, US health-product giant Johnson & Johnson (J&J) is suing the American Red Cross for, wait for it… using the red cross symbol on some commercial products the charity sells to raise funds for its disaster relief services.

The New Jersey-based maker of such things as Band-Aids®, Rogaine®, Tylenol® and Wart-Off®, is arguing that it has exclusive rights to use the world famous symbol for its own first-aid products and is seeking a court injunction ordering the American Red Cross to stop using the symbol on its commercial products.

The care bears at J&J are also demanding that the Red Cross hand over all their first-aid and emergency preparedness products for immediate destruction and are calling for unspecified damages. Bless their hearts.

The non-profit disaster relief charity sells branded first-aid kits as part of its fundraising efforts. According to the organization, it received only $2 million in revenue from the sale of such products in 2006. In contrast, J&J received $53.3 billion in revenue over the same period. The American Red Cross meanwhile is facing a budget deficit after a record number of disasters in the region in the past few years, including Hurricane Katrina.

Incidentally, the first use of the Red Cross symbol was, er, by the Red Cross. The International Red Cross was formed in 1863 in Geneva, 14 years before J&J began using the symbol for its first-aid products. The American branch of the Red Cross was set up six years before J&J first started using one of the world’s most famous icons for mere commerce.

It is likely going to take more than a few Band-Aids® for J&J to heal the wounds from all the negative publicity we expect to see regarding this case. Perhaps they should consider contracting the Red Cross to help them with this particular PR disaster.

This first appeared in our award-winning magazine - to read more, subscribe from just £7

Comments on Trademark travesty

Leave your comment


  • Maximum characters allowed: 5000
  • Simple HTML allowed: bold, italic, and links

Registration is quick and easy. Plus you won’t have to re-type the blurry words to comment!
Register | Login

...And all is quiet.

Subscribe to Comments for this articleArticle Comment Feed RSS 2.0

Guidelines: Please be respectful of others when posting your reply.

This article was originally published in issue 405

New Internationalist Magazine issue 405
Issue 405

More articles from this issue

  • Israel, Palestine and the hypocrisy of power

    October 1, 2007

    Noam Chomsky anatomizes the current US-Israel ‘project’.

  • Sri Lanka

    October 1, 2007

    Over two decades of conflict have bred a climate of impunity where human rights violations – killings and unexplained ‘disappearances’ of people – have become all too common.

  • ‘Save our Slum!’

    October 1, 2007

    Resisting demolition of poor homes in Argentina.

New Internationalist Magazine Issue 436

If you would like to know something about what's actually going on, rather than what people would like you to think was going on, then read the New Internationalist.

– Emma Thompson –

A subscription to suit you

Save money with a digital subscription. Give a gift subscription that will last all year. Or get yourself a free trial to New Internationalist. See our choice of offers.