New Internationalist

Slavery distinctions

November 2004

In the otherwise excellent ‘The white curse’ (View from the South, NI 370) Eduardo Galeano fails to distinguish clearly between slavery and the slave trade. It was the slave trade that Britain abolished in 1807. Slavery itself continued in British possessions, principally in the Caribbean, until 1832.

The British record on slavery is somewhat better than he concedes. It was abolished in Britain as early as 1744, by the well-known Court decision in the case of the runaway slave James Somerset, which decreed that as soon as a slave set foot in England, they were free.

Roger Butters Hixon, England

Front cover of New Internationalist magazine, issue 373 This column was published in the November 2004 issue of New Internationalist. To read more, buy this issue or subscribe.

Never miss another story! Get our FREE fortnightly eNews

Comments on Slavery distinctions

Leave your comment


  • Maximum characters allowed: 5000
  • Simple HTML allowed: bold, italic, and links

Registration is quick and easy. Plus you won’t have to re-type the blurry words to comment!
Register | Login

...And all is quiet.

Subscribe to Comments for this articleArticle Comment Feed RSS 2.0

Guidelines: Please be respectful of others when posting your reply.

Get our free fortnightly eNews


Videos from visionOntv’s globalviews channel.

Related articles

Recently in Letters

All Letters

Popular tags

All tags

This article was originally published in issue 373

New Internationalist Magazine issue 373
Issue 373

More articles from this issue

New Internationalist Magazine Issue 436

If you would like to know something about what's actually going on, rather than what people would like you to think was going on, then read the New Internationalist.

– Emma Thompson –

A subscription to suit you

Save money with a digital subscription. Give a gift subscription that will last all year. Or get yourself a free trial to New Internationalist. See our choice of offers.