New Internationalist

Satellite wars

February 2004

How you like your news cooked depends on where you’re coming from. Reem Haddad on the surge in Arab media.

Illustration: <b>Sarah John</b>
Illustration: Sarah John

My father couldn’t wait to return from his travels in the United States.

Finally,’ he declared as he switched on the television, ‘I’ll know what is really happening.’

For several days, he stayed glued to the television, only interrupting himself every so often to seek my mother and vent his frustrations.

You see, you see,’ he would say to her fuming, ‘CNN and others (Western broadcasters) don’t tell us what’s going on. We don’t know what is really happening to the Palestinians. We don’t know what is really going on in Iraq. And they call themselves journalists!’

Thank God,’ he would add emphatically, ‘there’s al Jazeera.’

Many sighs of relief were sighed seven years ago when the Arab satellite channel was established. For the first time, Arabs didn’t have to rely on the Western media to get the news and spend hours afterwards grumbling about it. Western media has always been seen as biased, anti-Arab and pro-Israel. But now, for the first time, details of Palestinians’ lives under occupation were portrayed, Arab analysts and activists could speak out and Arab regimes themselves could be criticised (although this did not go down too well with the regimes in question). It was, to say the least, refreshing.

The al Jazeera network quickly spread to over 45 million homes, its news and programmes becoming the talk of the Arab world.

While al Jazeera and its audience sees the network as fair – even giving air time to Israeli speakers (an unheard of concept in the Arab world) – it has come under harsh criticism, most notably by the US administration. Its footage of dead US soldiers and captured soldiers during the Iraq war, and its airing of tapes of Osama Bin Laden angered US officials.

For Arabs the US anger revealed a certain bias.

Why is it OK for CNN to give Ariel Sharon air time yet Jazeera can’t broadcast Bin Laden tapes?’ says Wael, an avid Jazeera fan. ‘Bin Laden is a terrorist and Sharon is a terrorist. It’s the same double standard all over again. America can do what it wants and we can’t.’

To the relief of many Arabs, satellite channels continued to air news as they saw fit.

This is one place where the US cannot force us to do what it wants,’ says Wael.

During the Iraq war, US forces struck the Jazeera headquarters in Baghdad, killing a journalist, Tariq Ayoub. The air strike enraged the Arab world who accused Washington of deliberately attempting to silence the network. Jazeera offices were also hit by US forces in Kabul in November 2001.

Al Jazeera’s success prompted others to follow suit. Three years ago, al Manar began satellite broadcasts after almost a decade of transmitting solely to Lebanese viewers. The broadcasts were created for one reason: to support the Palestinians in their Intifada. The major part of news bulletins is dedicated to giving details of the uprising as reported by local journalists.

The network, based in Beirut, is run by the Lebanese Shi’a resistance party, Hizbullah – staunch supporters of the Palestinians. Their broadcast came as no surprise to anyone and became an instant success throughout the Arab world, especially in the Palestinian occupied territories. Unlike al Jazeera, however, al Manar provides news with an all too obvious slant.

Suicide attacks on Israelis are fully reported through live feeds and are termed as ‘ martyr operations’. Israelis are referred to as ‘aggressors’ or the ‘Zionist enemy’. Iraqi military operations against coalition forces, suicide or otherwise, on the other hand, are referred to as ‘attacks’ – a clear indication that Hizbullah’s main enemy is Israel.

Not to be outdone, many other Arab networks began satellite broadcasts, mainly from Lebanon and the Gulf.

Analysts believe that the pan-Arab satellite networks have increased Arab cross-border interaction as they became forums for public, political and social debates.

The only difference between us and CNN is that we give air time to Arabs to speak out,’ said a friend of mine who works at al Jazeera. ‘We have the same news. We cover everything just like they do. Our journalists are on the spot like they are.’

Since its inception, several of my friends have joined the network in Qatar or other Arab channels. They want to contribute to fighting what they see as a pro-Israeli Western media. ‘We may not be able to fight and win a war with the West,’ said Jad, a teacher at a local school. ‘But we can and will fight a media war.’

Reem Haddad works for the Daily Star in Beirut.

Front cover of New Internationalist magazine, issue 364 This column was published in the February 2004 issue of New Internationalist. To read more, buy this issue or subscribe.

Never miss another story! Get our FREE fortnightly eNews

Comments on Satellite wars

Leave your comment


  • Maximum characters allowed: 5000
  • Simple HTML allowed: bold, italic, and links

Registration is quick and easy. Plus you won’t have to re-type the blurry words to comment!
Register | Login

...And all is quiet.

Subscribe to Comments for this articleArticle Comment Feed RSS 2.0

Guidelines: Please be respectful of others when posting your reply.

Get our free fortnightly eNews


Videos from visionOntv’s globalviews channel.

Related articles

Recently in Writing home

All Writing home

Popular tags

All tags

This article was originally published in issue 364

New Internationalist Magazine issue 364
Issue 364

More articles from this issue

  • You get proud by practising

    February 1, 2004

    A poem by Laura Hershey, poet and disability activist.

  • Strong & smart

    February 1, 2004

    Teacher Chris Sarra is turning upside-down ideas about what Aboriginal kids can and can’t do.

  • I was born white

    February 1, 2004

    Mark Minchinton undertakes a journey back to his – and his country’s – Aboriginal roots.

New Internationalist Magazine Issue 436

If you would like to know something about what's actually going on, rather than what people would like you to think was going on, then read the New Internationalist.

– Emma Thompson –

A subscription to suit you

Save money with a digital subscription. Give a gift subscription that will last all year. Or get yourself a free trial to New Internationalist. See our choice of offers.