New Internationalist

United Nations of America?

April 2005

You could be forgiven for having missed the announcement by UN Secretary-General Kofi Annan in January that the next Executive Director of UNICEF is to be Ann Veneman, until recently US President George W Bush’s Agriculture Secretary. But it was a moment that should not pass without protest.

Technically the choice of a new UNICEF head is recommended by the UN Secretary-General to the organization’s Board. In practice it is openly acknowledged to be in the gift of the White House – and nobody even seems shamefaced about the fact.

So it is that an organization which exists to defend the rights and interests of all the world’s children has the next decade of its work dictated by the whims of domestic US politics. Had John Kerry won the US presidential election last November, he would doubtless have appointed someone considered to be of like political mind, as Bill Clinton appointed the previous Executive Director, Carol Bellamy, 10 years ago. As it is, the US Right has already been crowing about the appointment signalling a rollback of the Bellamy era and its championing of children’s and women’s rights.

At the press conference following the announcement of her appointment, Ann Veneman was asked about her position on reproductive rights – a red rag issue for the US Right. ‘I don’t believe that these issues are relevant to the mission of UNICEF,’ she replied.

The issue extends far beyond UNICEF itself and undermines the credibility of the whole UN system. Organizations in the UN system belong to the whole world and the top posts in them should be publicly and openly advertised to ensure that the best person for the job wins through. They should not be beholden to any one national government, let alone the world’s one hyperpower.

The next major international public appointment to come up is that of World Bank President, since James Wolfensohn is stepping down later this year. The latest nightmare revelation that Iraq hawk and freemarket fundamentalist Paul Wolfowitz is the current favourite for the job only adds fuel to the fire. James Wolfensohn has already said openly that his successor will be appointed by the White House – as with the UNICEF post, the World Bank President has ‘by tradition’ been a US citizen.

Yes, well… ‘By tradition’ women in many parts of the world suffer genital mutilation. ‘By tradition’ some people are allocated to a lifetime role of cleaning other people’s toilets. ‘By tradition’ many countries in the world are ruled by brutal dictators. There are some traditions that are simply and utterly indefensible.

Front cover of New Internationalist magazine, issue 377 This column was published in the April 2005 issue of New Internationalist. To read more, buy this issue or subscribe.

Never miss another story! Get our FREE fortnightly eNews

Comments on United Nations of America?

Leave your comment







 

  • Maximum characters allowed: 5000
  • Simple HTML allowed: bold, italic, and links

Registration is quick and easy. Plus you won’t have to re-type the blurry words to comment!
Register | Login

...And all is quiet.

Subscribe to Comments for this articleArticle Comment Feed RSS 2.0

Guidelines: Please be respectful of others when posting your reply.

Get our free fortnightly eNews

Multimedia

Videos from visionOntv’s globalviews channel.

Related articles

Recently in Web only

All Web only

Popular tags

All tags

This article was originally published in issue 377

New Internationalist Magazine issue 377
Issue 377

More articles from this issue

New Internationalist Magazine Issue 436

If you would like to know something about what's actually going on, rather than what people would like you to think was going on, then read the New Internationalist.

– Emma Thompson –

A subscription to suit you

Save money with a digital subscription. Give a gift subscription that will last all year. Or get yourself a free trial to New Internationalist. See our choice of offers.

Subscribe