New Internationalist

After the bombs

October 2007

Residents of atoll bombed ‘for the good of mankind’ are still getting a raw deal

Bikini Atoll is as close to the middle of nowhere as you can get. This is why the US tested its nuclear weapons there. Bikini Island, the largest in the atoll, is an eerie place. On a fragrant evening, beneath palms hurling coconuts to the ground in startling thuds, a concrete pad shines in the moonlight. It’s all that remains of a church where the people of Bikini once worshipped. Then one fine morning in early 1946, US Commodore Ben Wyatt stood there and asked Bikini’s 167 inhabitants to leave – ‘for the good of mankind and to end all world wars’ – so that the US could test nukes in their turquoise home.

Sixty-one years later and thousands of miles away, on 2 August the US Court of Federal Claims dismissed a lawsuit against the US on behalf of almost 4,000 survivors and descendants of those Bikinians. They are demanding that over a half billion dollars that was awarded in 2001 by the Majuro-based Nuclear Claims Tribunal (NCT) be paid. The NCT, created in 1986 between the US and Republic of the Marshall Islands (RMI), has only been able to pay a fraction of that award. But the judge said it’s a political issue, and that Bikinians should complain to the US Congress.

Bikinians are used to setbacks. They’ve suffered starvation and countless indignities. Some returned to Bikini in 1972, only to leave again in 1978 when told they were being poisoned by residual radiation. A 1981 lawsuit was dismissed when the NCT was set up to adjudicate claims. But the NCT, under-funded by the US, has been swamped by claims from atolls across the northern Marshalls and has issued almost $2.5 billion in personal injury and property damage awards. It’s now virtually broke.

While demands for compensation have fostered a mentality of entitlement and inertia, the inhabitants of Marshall Islands’ nuclear atolls are taking their lives in their own hands. The people of Enewetok, where 44 tests occurred, have resettled a portion of their atoll. Rongelap, showered by fallout from the colossal Bravo H-bomb at Bikini in 1954, is pitching its pristine reefs to ecotourists. Bikini’s dive operation has been running since 1996, cashing in on the wrecks of two dozen warships scuttled there in 1946.

Still, most Bikinians aren’t returning home. Edward Maddison has lived on Bikini Island since 1985, helping the US Department of Energy monitor soil and test cleanup techniques, mapping ‘ghost wrecks’ and accompanying tourists to the bottom of the lagoon. But others are slow to follow. Older Bikinians say they’ll return when the entire atoll is clean and local food safe to eat. Younger generations who’ve never even seen Bikini view their ancestral home as a quaint myth. In the absence of reliable air or sea links to Bikini, and of Bikinian leaders with the gumption to visit regularly – or move here to boost their community’s confidence – there’s no guessing when this lovely, lonely atoll will ever be resettled.

Dave Kattenburg

This column was published in the October 2007 issue of New Internationalist. To read more, buy this issue or subscribe.

Comments on After the bombs

Leave your comment


  • Maximum characters allowed: 5000
  • Simple HTML allowed: bold, italic, and links

Registration is quick and easy. Plus you won’t have to re-type the blurry words to comment!
Register | Login

...And all is quiet.

Subscribe to Comments for this articleArticle Comment Feed RSS 2.0

Guidelines: Please be respectful of others when posting your reply.

Get our free fortnightly eNews


Videos from visionOntv’s globalviews channel.

Related articles

Recently in Currents

All Currents

Popular tags

All tags

This article was originally published in issue 405

New Internationalist Magazine issue 405
Issue 405

More articles from this issue

  • Israel, Palestine and the hypocrisy of power

    October 1, 2007

    Noam Chomsky anatomizes the current US-Israel ‘project’.

  • Sri Lanka

    October 1, 2007

    Over two decades of conflict have bred a climate of impunity where human rights violations – killings and unexplained ‘disappearances’ of people – have become all too common.

  • ‘Save our Slum!’

    October 1, 2007

    Resisting demolition of poor homes in Argentina.

New Internationalist Magazine Issue 436

If you would like to know something about what's actually going on, rather than what people would like you to think was going on, then read the New Internationalist.

– Emma Thompson –

A subscription to suit you

Save money with a digital subscription. Give a gift subscription that will last all year. Or get yourself a free trial to New Internationalist. See our choice of offers.