New Internationalist

Brazilians say no

November 2002

Brazilians say no to American free trade

Katharine Ainger
The pan-American alliance against the FTAA (ALCA in Spanish) was launched at this march during the World Social Forum in Brazil in February 2002. Katharine Ainger

Approximately 98 per cent of the 10.1 million people who responded to a survey conducted at the beginning of September in 3,894 municipalities throughout Brazil gave a resounding ‘no’ to the question: ‘Should the Brazilian Government sign the FTAA treaty?’

The treaty was proposed by the United States and is slated to be ready for ratification in 2004. Furthermore, 95 per cent of the voters indicated that Brazil should not even ‘continue participating in the FTAA negotiations,’ in response to the second question put forth in what the organizers dubbed a ‘people’s plebiscite’.

The plebiscite co-ordinators – Brazil’s National Bishops Conference (CNOB), the Movimento Sem Terra (Movement of Landless Workers), Central Union of Workers and other groups – had hoped for at least six million voters to take part in the ‘consultation’. This total was reached in a similar experience in 2000, when 96 per cent responded that Brazil should stop paying its foreign debt. In the end those hopes were vastly exceeded.

There is widespread understanding, according to Catholic priest Alfredo Gonçalves, that the FTAA could shut down a debilitated economy like Brazil’s and leave this South American giant – with its population of 170 million – defenceless to a world power while bankruptcies and unemployment multiplied.

And without Brazil, there is no FTAA,’ says Gonçalves. Firm opposition from Brazil ‘would change the direction’ of the negotiations under way, he said.

Between September 2002 and March 2003 civil-society groups in all countries in the Americas have pledged to carry out similar consultations of popular opinion.

Front cover of New Internationalist magazine, issue 351 This column was published in the November 2002 issue of New Internationalist. To read more, buy this issue or subscribe.

Comments on Brazilians say no

Leave your comment


  • Maximum characters allowed: 5000
  • Simple HTML allowed: bold, italic, and links

Registration is quick and easy. Plus you won’t have to re-type the blurry words to comment!
Register | Login

...And all is quiet.

Subscribe to Comments for this articleArticle Comment Feed RSS 2.0

Guidelines: Please be respectful of others when posting your reply.

Get our free fortnightly eNews


Videos from visionOntv’s globalviews channel.

Related articles

Recently in Currents

All Currents

Popular tags

All tags

This article was originally published in issue 351

New Internationalist Magazine issue 351
Issue 351

More articles from this issue

  • a narrow victory

    November 1, 2002

    Africans are desperate to protect hard-won democracy, as Ike Oguine explains.

  • Polyp's Big Bad World – November 2002

    November 1, 2002

    Bombs away.

  • Innocence behind bars

    November 1, 2002

    WEB EXCLUSIVE For decades the US has been jailing more and more of its own citizens. The result, as Bernice Yeung reports, is an increasing number of innocent victims inside, as well as outside, the criminal-justice system – and growing agitation

New Internationalist Magazine Issue 436

If you would like to know something about what's actually going on, rather than what people would like you to think was going on, then read the New Internationalist.

– Emma Thompson –

A subscription to suit you

Save money with a digital subscription. Give a gift subscription that will last all year. Or get yourself a free trial to New Internationalist. See our choice of offers.