New Internationalist

Cancun or bust

November 2002

unnoticed WTO victory at Johannesburg

There were those who feared that the World Summit on Sustainable Development in Johannesburg last September would mark not two steps forward towards saving the earth, but three steps back. Green campaigners fought long and hard against the subordination of global environmental agreements – such as those on endangered species and toxic waste won at previous Earth Summits – to free-trade rules under the auspices of the World Trade Organization. This would effectively have allowed the gutting of multilateral environmental agreements that corporate interests deemed ‘barriers to trade’. So there were sighs of relief all round when international environmental law was apparently saved from the free-trade chainsaw by the removal of references to ‘WTO consistency’ in the Johannesburg declaration. But Victor Menotti, director of the International Forum on Globalization’s Environment Program, has some bad news. Take a closer look at the text. In fact the UN’s environmental regimes are committed to ‘support of the work plan agreed through the WTO’. That means that trade ministers – not environment ministers – will decide the fate of multilateral environment agreements at the next ministerial meeting of the WTO in Cancun, Mexico, in September 2003. The secretariats of the environment agreements will be granted only observer status at the meeting as the hard-won treaties they administer are eviscerated. At that news, memories of the protests in Seattle at the 1999 ministerial meeting will surely resurface in the minds of campaigners. Victor is not the only one among them saying, ‘See you in Cancun!’

Front cover of New Internationalist magazine, issue 351 This column was published in the November 2002 issue of New Internationalist. To read more, buy this issue or subscribe.

Comments on Cancun or bust

Leave your comment


  • Maximum characters allowed: 5000
  • Simple HTML allowed: bold, italic, and links

Registration is quick and easy. Plus you won’t have to re-type the blurry words to comment!
Register | Login

...And all is quiet.

Subscribe to Comments for this articleArticle Comment Feed RSS 2.0

Guidelines: Please be respectful of others when posting your reply.

Get our free fortnightly eNews


Videos from visionOntv’s globalviews channel.

Related articles

Recently in Currents

All Currents

Popular tags

All tags

This article was originally published in issue 351

New Internationalist Magazine issue 351
Issue 351

More articles from this issue

  • a narrow victory

    November 1, 2002

    Africans are desperate to protect hard-won democracy, as Ike Oguine explains.

  • Polyp's Big Bad World – November 2002

    November 1, 2002

    Bombs away.

  • Innocence behind bars

    November 1, 2002

    WEB EXCLUSIVE For decades the US has been jailing more and more of its own citizens. The result, as Bernice Yeung reports, is an increasing number of innocent victims inside, as well as outside, the criminal-justice system – and growing agitation

New Internationalist Magazine Issue 436

If you would like to know something about what's actually going on, rather than what people would like you to think was going on, then read the New Internationalist.

– Emma Thompson –

A subscription to suit you

Save money with a digital subscription. Give a gift subscription that will last all year. Or get yourself a free trial to New Internationalist. See our choice of offers.