New Internationalist

US ban on Israel boycott

July 2002

US citizens who wish to boycott Israeli goods in protest at the Palestinian situation may find themselves in trouble. Such boycotts are actually illegal under US law. US Department of Commerce trade amendments ‘counteract the participation of US citizens… in economic boycotts or embargoes’. They cover ‘all persons and every aspect of commerce’. The legislation was passed in the 1970s to target the Arab League boycott of Israel, and rules that: ‘Refusal to do business with Israel may result in a fine of up to $50,000 and five years’ imprisonment.’

Ernesto Cienfuegos, editor of Californian news agency La Voz Aztlan who has promoted the Israeli boycott, is threatened by the Act, which was updated in November 2000. The maximum imprisonment is ten years.

Nevertheless, other US citizens are risking the boycott-ban laws. US company Texas Exports denied auto-parts sales to an Israeli company. CEO John Harris said: ‘We urge you to rein in your military and stop oppression of the Palestinian people. Your country has lost the respect of the civilized world.’ Hundreds of negative calls and death threats ensued.

On US campuses students are demanding that universities divest themselves of Israel-linked endowments and investments. The University of California, for example, has $3.5 billion invested in companies with significant holdings in Israel. Israeli academics too are demanding severance of academic ties with their country. Defying hate mail, professors from Tel Aviv, Ben Gurion and Haifa Universities in Israel have joined their US colleagues’ initiatives.

An ‘appeal to the world’ has also been initiated by 26 Jewish citizens and nine Jews of other nationalities calling for a global boycott of all Israeli ‘exports, leisure and tourism in the hope that it will have the same positive result that the boycott of South Africa had’ on the apartheid regime there. Jewish endorsements have flooded in from Iceland to India, from the Arctic to the Antipodes. The boycott movement is gathering momentum, despite the US ban.

Felicity Arbuthnot

Front cover of New Internationalist magazine, issue 347 This column was published in the July 2002 issue of New Internationalist. To read more, buy this issue or subscribe.

Comments on US ban on Israel boycott

Leave your comment


  • Maximum characters allowed: 5000
  • Simple HTML allowed: bold, italic, and links

Registration is quick and easy. Plus you won’t have to re-type the blurry words to comment!
Register | Login

...And all is quiet.

Subscribe to Comments for this articleArticle Comment Feed RSS 2.0

Guidelines: Please be respectful of others when posting your reply.

Get our free fortnightly eNews


Videos from visionOntv’s globalviews channel.

Related articles

Recently in Currents

All Currents

Popular tags

All tags

This article was originally published in issue 347

New Internationalist Magazine issue 347
Issue 347

More articles from this issue

  • A tale of two coups

    July 1, 2002

    What happens when a country offends transnationals? Greg Palast reveals the suppressed story of the military coup in Venezuela and compares it with the international financiers’ coup in Argentina.

  • The Naked Lobbyist

    July 1, 2002

    Corporate Europe Observatory uncovers the mightiest business lobby groups you’ve never heard of.

  • Earth summit for sale

    July 1, 2002

    On the eve of the Earth Summit in Johannesburg, Katharine Ainger finds out how the UN learned to stop worrying and love big business; PLUS deconstructing corporate eco-speak, with help from Orwell.

New Internationalist Magazine Issue 436

If you would like to know something about what's actually going on, rather than what people would like you to think was going on, then read the New Internationalist.

– Emma Thompson –

A subscription to suit you

Save money with a digital subscription. Give a gift subscription that will last all year. Or get yourself a free trial to New Internationalist. See our choice of offers.