New Internationalist

Perl: Love it, or hate it, but don’t ignore it.

Call me a curmudgeon (and many do), but I just can’t understand why intelligent folks make the choice to completely ignore Perl. I can understand if you don’t want to use it yourself — that’s all cool — but I wish folks would at least give it the nod it deserves.

Case in point: I was reading Simon Wilson’s excellent blog post about Node.js — an "evented I/O for V8 javascript” and was surprised that he only referenced Twisted (Python) and EventMachine (Ruby) when talking about non-blocking event-driven frameworks.

Why no mention of Perl? In reading about Node.js, it looks like one of the critical pieces of Node.js — libev — was co-authored by Marc Lehmann, a rather prolific CPAN contributor. Mark also appears to be the author of AnyEvent, one of Perl’s own even-driven frameworks. It’s not like PSGI and Plack and POE haven’t been getting some good attention lately. And even the slideshow listed at the end of Simon’s post mentions AnyEvent as an alternate event-driven option.

So what happened?

As most Perlers have probably experienced, this is not an isolated event. Virtually every discussion of Web frameworks — Ruby on Rails, Django on Python, Symphony on PHP — manage to avoid any mention of Catalyst, Jifty, or the Mojo Web Framework.

Given Catalyst’s lineage — fork of a Perl MVC framework called Maypole — I find it a bit strange that it’s so often left out of the picture. (Even more strange when one considers that Catalyst is technically older that Ruby on Rails — or so I’ve read.)

So.. Why do intelligent programmers so often leave Perl out of picture when talking about new approaches? Is it a conspiracy? Just plain oversight? Or the legend of "Perl is dead" rearing it’s head again?

I don’t have an answer, but I wish I did. (Though, I’d probably start my investigation with the lackluster attention that O’Reilly gives to Perl.com.)

There’s lots of activity around Perl. Just check out StackOverflow or commandlinefu.com. Supposedly Perl Web searches are on the rise, and the Twitterverse is all a-flutter with everything Perl, and Perl.org got a design refresh (hats off to those involved).

As the old saying goes: Love me, or hate me, just don’t ingore me. If people want to hate on Perl, so be it. But I propose that it would benefit the Perl community to ensure that Perl is not ingored.

So the next question is: How do we raise the volume even higher?

Comments on Perl: Love it, or hate it, but don't ignore it.

Leave your comment







 

  • Maximum characters allowed: 5000
  • Simple HTML allowed: bold, italic, and links

Registration is quick and easy. Plus you won’t have to re-type the blurry words to comment!
Register | Login

  1. #2 placid 11 Jan 11

    becs

    r_ing

    perl

    _ _

    lk

    dcfrng

    ths

    msg

    :P

  2. #3 ciderpunx 11 Jan 11

    @placid

    $that ne 'true'; $i->{$m}->{$h}-{$o};

    $_['possible'] for(write_fortran(grep /any/, @language));
    $but;
    not $necessary for(write_perl eq 'read_only');
    just_my(4>1 . 'cents worth');

  3. #4 PerfectCyph3r 07 Feb 13

    It's good, but....

    We don't like perl because it is so un-intuitive!

    I would much rather program in any other language than perl!!!

    Source of experience: Network Security Analyst working in a Fortune 500 company of over 50,000 people!

Subscribe to Comments for this articleArticle Comment Feed RSS 2.0

Guidelines: Please be respectful of others when posting your reply.

Get our free fortnightly eNews

Multimedia

Videos from visionOntv's globalviews channel.

Related articles

Popular tags

All tags

The Tech Blog

This is where New Internationalist Web Team documents the free and open software used to build this website and its services, discusses emerging issues in the technology space, and provide critical analysis, news and commentary on all things IT and web.

The Tech Blog