New Internationalist

India hangs Kashmir man on ‘circumstantial evidence’

Anti India graffiti in Kashmir

As I write this from New Delhi, Kashmir has been under siege for over a week. I received a phone call from someone in Kashmir asking me what the situation was like on the ground in the Valley – although he was right there, he was trapped in his home so didn’t know what was happening. ‘Kashmir is yet again an open prison,’ he told me. ‘It is déjà-vu. Afzal has been hanged. Sitting here, I don’t even know what’s happening in the neighbourhood. The army is stationed outside my window.’

Afzal is Muhammad Afzal Guru. Early in the morning on 9 February, the Indian state secretly hanged him. Accused of the attack on the Indian Parliament in 2001, he was denied a fair trial and a mercy petition filed by his wife in 2006 was rejected this January. Afzal languished in a small solitary cell in Delhi’s highly fortified Tihar jail for 12 years until his ‘judicial murder’.

His family in Kashmir wasn’t informed of the decision. Authorities chose to inform his wife and son via the government’s postal department; the letter announcing Afzal’s death reached his home in north Kashmir’s Sopore two days later. His son Ghalib, who was two years old when Afzal was arrested, said, on hearing about his execution: ‘I only want to see his face.’

The Indian government, in an attempt to hide the fact that they had committed a gross violation of the family’s human rights by keeping them in the dark, offered them the opportunity to say prayers at his burial site. However, this would only be permitted if a ‘proper request’ from the family comes via a letter signed by Afzal’s wife, along with a ‘probate form’ attached to prove her relationship to him.

His wife turned down the offer, demanding that the mortal remains of her husband be returned to her. ‘We don’t want him buried in the land that doesn’t belong to us,’ she explained.

Analysts who observed the police investigations and court case against Afzal say that there was no concrete evidence against him. India’s Apex Court noted the evidence was only ‘circumstantial’, but went on to announce capital punishment to ‘satisfy the collective conscience of society’. The decision to hang a man on the basis of circumstantial evidence is unparalleled.

If the world’s largest democracy can send such a message, then there is a need to reframe the idea of a democracy. Writer Arundhati Roy comments, ‘The hanging of Afzal Guru is a stain on India’s democracy.’ Over 200 academics, writers and filmmakers have written to the Indian President expressing their anguish and outrage.

While Afzal’s hanging drew strong condemnation from human rights groups across the globe,  rightwing Hindu ultra-nationalist groups celebrated by distributing sweets, bursting crackers, burning effigies of Afzal, and chanting Bharat Maata ki Jai (Long live Mother India). Narendra Modi, a possible Prime Ministerial candidate for the Hindu nationalist Bharatiya Janata Party, who is accused of overseeing a pogrom against minority Muslims when he was Chief of the western Indian state of Gujarat in 2002, tweeted: ‘Better late than never.’

The decision of the court is seen as a well thought-out strategy motivated by party politics: the ruling Congress-led coalition outsmarting the opposition ahead of elections.

Afzal and three others were arrested by the notorious special cell of the Delhi police, two days after the attack on the Indian Parliament on 13 December 2001. Three of the four, including Afzal, were sentenced to death. But a higher court overturned the verdict. Although the apex court upheld the acquittal, in 2005, it gave Afzal three life sentences and a double death sentence based on ‘circumstantial evidence’.

In various parts of India, Kashmir youth and others protested against the hanging. A placard from a protest in South India read: ‘Dear Kashmiris, we Tamils stand with you. Down with Indian hegemony.’ In Delhi, rightwing Hindu organizations assaulted Kashmir youngsters as they protested and police detained 21 of them. Kashmir students were also detained in Dehra Dun in India’s north.

In Kashmir, the Indian state is using its ‘normal’ repression and control tactics, including strict curfew, a news blackout, and more soldiers on the streets, firing at unarmed protesters and even bystanders. Teargas, pepper guns and bullets are being used to quell the protests. Basic necessities such as milk, bread and medicines are inaccessible. Three youths, one just 12 years old, have died. Among the hundreds injured is a young boy who lost his eye. Leaders of resistance groups were either arrested or given house-arrest before Afzal was hanged.

The government has given absurd directives to doctors, already working under extreme pressure during the curfew. They have been told ‘that nobody should die’ and ‘not to declare anybody dead if they succumb’. The dead are, instead, to be put on ventilators, even though the doctors argue that this is ‘ethically wrong’.

Despite a stringent curfew, the people of Kashmir reserved an empty grave for Afzal next to the grave of resistance leader Maqbool Bhat in the Martyrs’ graveyard. Maqbool Bhat was hanged in 1984 in the same jail as Afzal. Afzal’s epitaph reads: ‘…whose mortal remains are lying in the custody of the Government of India. The nation is awaiting its return.’ The tombstone, raised as a memorial, a symbolic protest and a reminder to the Indian state, was removed by the police and smashed to pieces. Owing to the public outcry, another epitaph was mysteriously put back. 

Photo of anti-India graffiti in Kashmir by Kashmir Global under a CC Licence.

Comments on India hangs Kashmir man on 'circumstantial evidence'

Leave your comment


  • Maximum characters allowed: 5000
  • Simple HTML allowed: bold, italic, and links

Registration is quick and easy. Plus you won’t have to re-type the blurry words to comment!
Register | Login

  1. #1 faizan 19 Feb 13

    its so unfortunate .
    his family could even stay the execution had they been informed in time even after the mercy petition been rejected which is exactly what verappan associates family has done so avoid the 3 mass murders being executed .
    this is proof enough of the congress appeasing Hindu majority

  2. #2 Ali Mohammad 20 Feb 13

    according to indian justice has been done but we may like to ask a simple question to them that where is ur justice while kashmiris are being killed, kashmiri womens/daughters are being raped and killed where is ur justice when ur army performed fake encounters in kashmir valley , where is ur justice when it come in ur notice that un indentified graves found in kashmir, why didnt u loud ur voice in these cases, why only in afzul gurus hanging u fight for justice. and for ur kind information it is totally un-lawful of hanging a person on . collective circumstantial evidences
    let me tell one thing tomorrow if all the kashmirs will come on streets and ask for hanging of ur pm then what will ur supreme court hang him up on collective circumstantial evidences basis. totally shame on indian bananas republic

  3. #4 Mir Rasool 22 Feb 13

    this is admitted fact that Mohammad Afzal Guru was denied a fair trial and a mercy petition filed by his wife in 2006 was rejected this January. Afzal languished in a small solitary cell in Delhi’s highly fortified Tihar jail for 12 years until his ‘judicial murder’yes this is reality and admitted fact, they killed him to gain vote bank, why BJP and saffron terrorists are not demanding execution of Baint singh killer of Punjab. this is reality that he was executed because he was kashmiri muslium and the real face of India is very aggressive towards the kashmiri musliums . .

  4. #5 AMEER TARIN 23 Feb 13

    India does not need any permission to ’democratically’ hang or kill anyone in cold blood. It has a license and is not answerable because India is a nuclear power and very rightly its erstwhile army chief Kapur stated: ’We can take on China and Pakistan simultaneously anytime’. Kashmir under military curfew for the last two weeks; does any human-right upholder, supporter of political rights or right to live freely, care?

  5. #6 Pirambar 23 Feb 13

    I'm sorry but the Indian media is being kind and feeds
    on controversies of its own making.

    It was established without any doubt that Afzal carried the perpetrators of the crime from Kashmir to Delhi and therefore was allied with them, that he was a trained member of a militant organization, that he had explosives in his hideout for this and similar attacks - obviously against the Indian state. See here -

    Also please read this which explains the real situation from the Pakistani perspective -

  6. #7 Judith 27 Feb 13

    There have also been rumours that brides discovered not to be virgins on their honeymoon night were also burnt or killed. Is this the case? All appalling and just goes to show the inferiority of women in some societies. The caste system based on colour in this 'so called' democracy is also unacceptable.

  7. #8 Jezi 28 Feb 13

    Judith, you might want to check the Gini coefficient which shows India and even Pakistan are more equal societies than the US. Please also check US divorce rate (>50%) and abortion rate (>30%) for acceptability by the international community.

  8. #9 Anik 28 Feb 13

    What a shame. Why do you people think like that. India is not against Kashimiri Muslims. Afzal Guru plotted the attack on India Parliament and his confession is on record. Anyone who does such an act must be given the same punishment irrespective of religion or purpose. No nation can accept an attack on its sovereignity. This article is false propoganda.

Subscribe to Comments for this articleArticle Comment Feed RSS 2.0

Guidelines: Please be respectful of others when posting your reply.

Get our free fortnightly eNews


Videos from visionOntv’s globalviews channel.

Related articles

Popular tags

All tags

The Majority World Blog

Get a different view on the global zeitgeist from our dedicated team of Majority World bloggers, blogging from Africa, Asia and Latin America.

The Majority World Blog