New Internationalist

Something myth-ing? What they don’t tell us about African agriculture

Cocoa beans [Related Image]
In 2011, cocoa beans were Africa's top export. Francesco Veronesi under a Creative Commons Licence

One of the myths outlined in the report The Poor Are Getting Richer and Other Dangerous Delusions that Global Justice Now (previously WDM) released last week to coincide with the Davos World Economic Forum, is that Africa needs our help. A variation of this myth, that African agriculture needs help from rich Western countries, is constantly spun out by the media, investors, agribusiness companies and other transnationals. It sometimes feels like we’re being forced to participate in a modified version of the BBC Radio 4 show The Unbelievable Truth where panellists have to give a lecture full of lies while smuggling a handful of truths past the other players. In the case of the ‘Africa needs our help’ narrative, the game is played so that a handful of truths are used to smuggle some hugely significant lies past unsuspecting governments, NGOs and civil society.

Take the issue of agricultural production in Africa. The truths that the mainstream narrative pick out are that one in four people in Sub-Saharan Africa are undernourished, and that Africa has the lowest levels of agricultural productivity in the world, with extremely low levels of inputs like fertilizers, improved seeds and irrigation. It is also true that high population growth rates, high levels of poverty, poor infrastructure and low levels of investment have compounded the problem and made food difficult to access for millions of people.

But from these truths, the mainstream narrative moves to a false conclusion: that with the financial and technical help provided by rich countries and international development agencies – such as the $10 billion of ‘responsible private investments’ committed through the New Alliance to date – employment and food production will receive a huge boost and Africa will finally be able to feed itself.

It is certainly true that millions of people in Africa suffer from hunger and malnutrition, but nonetheless this narrative is partial and misleading. It is missing context, crucially failing to ask why this has happened in a continent that used to be self-sufficient in food in the 1960s. There are two main reasons for this, and they point to a very different solution to the problem of African poverty.

Firstly Africa’s agricultural production was designed during the colonial era to benefit rich countries in the North with their enormous appetite for raw materials and luxury (non-staple) foods. In 2011, the top five exports out of Africa (by value) were cocoa beans, coffee, cotton, rubber and tobacco; more useful for satisfying rich consumers than feeding poor communities.

Secondly, African countries have been forced to deregulate their trade by rich countries and financial institutions like the International Monetary Fund and World Bank. These institutions continue to lend money to developing countries while encouraging them to privatize public services and deregulate their economies. So, countries end up importing staple foods like wheat, palm oil, maize, sugar and soya-bean oil – crops largely produced by rich countries in the North, which can afford to heavily subsidize their agricultural sector. They have also opened up Africa to agribusiness companies that are rapidly increasing their control of resources such as land, water and labour.

Mainstream media, transnational corporations and government agencies tell us that Africa needs GM technology and chemical fertilizers to increase crop yields. What they don’t tell us is that the use of GM seeds actually leads to falling crop yields in the long term, and the increased use of pesticides and herbicides.

More and more evidence has been pouring in which shows that sustainable agriculture – or agroecology – can produce yields comparable to, and often larger than, industrial agriculture. But that’s not all. There are also huge positive knock-on effects of agroecology, such as increasing biodiversity, increasing income and employment opportunities, reducing the gender gap, improving health and nutrition, and helping to mitigate climate change.

Whether it’s by practising agroforestry, rice-duck farming or organic farming techniques, the evidence in support of agroecology is now indisputable. What we need is the political will to challenge the myth of corporate-controlled agriculture through reform of the aid system, opposition to unfair trade agreements, and by promoting the principles of agroecology and food sovereignty to help small-scale farmers regain control of Africa’s food system.

Ian Fitzpatrick

In February Global Justice Now will be publishing a report on agroecology in Africa outlining its benefits, the barriers preventing agroecology from being more widely adopted, and a set of policy proposals to overcome these barriers. globaljustice.org.uk

For Dangerous Delusions infographics visit the Global Justice Now website.

Comments on Something myth-ing? What they don’t tell us about African agriculture

Leave your comment







 

  • Maximum characters allowed: 5000
  • Simple HTML allowed: bold, italic, and links

Registration is quick and easy. Plus you won’t have to re-type the blurry words to comment!
Register | Login

  1. #1 Ingeyi 26 Jan 15

    We were just talking about this in school the other day. It is so sad to know that we are really the ones in charge of Africa's poverty and such. Colonialism was not something they can easily outgrow.

  2. #2 Brian G 28 Jan 15

    Things have not changed much. During the Irish potato Famine, the best land for farming was controlled foreign landholders growing luxury crops for England and Europe. Most refused to grow crops to alleviate the famine of Irish families, because there was not enough 'profit' in it, so families were forced to leave Ireland to survive.

  3. #3 Robert 31 Jan 15

    Thanks for the article. I am researching globalization and international trade agreements for my world politics class. Do you have any recommended sources for understanding some of how the global market is suppressing Africa (or other developing nations) through trade?

  4. #4 Helen 01 Feb 15

    Ian, It would be so useful to know which sources you used for the claims that ’the use of GM seeds actually leads to falling crop yields in the long term, and the increased use of pesticides and herbicides’. This is constantly the claim that is refuted by GM supporters. What evidence did you use to back this up?
    Many thanks!

  5. #5 Ian 03 Feb 15

    Hi Helen,
    This is the reference I used for the GM/yields issues:

    Union of Concerned Scientists (2009) Failure to Yield: Evaluating the Performance of Genetically Engineered Crops (Union of Concerned Scientists). Available at http://tinyurl.com/lypzufc, accessed 11 November, 2014

  6. #6 Ian 03 Feb 15

    Hi Robert-
    There's tonnes on information on these sorts of thing, just a matter of figuring out the best search terms to use!

    e.g. ’how subsidised imports affects africa’ brings up useful stuff like this:

    http://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/politics/eu-subsidies-deny-africas-farmers-of-their-livelihood-478419.html

    and this~

    http://tinyurl.com/myzbund

  7. #7 Clusterfarming 09 May 15

    Cluster Farming Empower people to grow food everywhere https://youtu.be/SmcFxl7MWdc

Subscribe to Comments for this articleArticle Comment Feed RSS 2.0

Guidelines: Please be respectful of others when posting your reply.

About the author

Ian Fitzpatrick is an anthropologist, ethnobotanist and freelance researcher on food, farming, and environmental sustainability.

Read more by Ian Fitzpatrick

Get our free fortnightly eNews

Multimedia

Videos from visionOntv’s globalviews channel.

Related articles

Popular tags

All tags

New Internationalist Blogs

New Internationalist hosts several different blogs, from the Editor's Blog to the Majority World Blog, the Gaza Blog to the Books Blog

New Internationalist Blogs