New Internationalist

TTIP is an affront to democracy

chickens.jpg [Related Image]
US agribusiness wants Europe to drop its ban on chlorine-washed chicken. Peter Cooper under a Creative Commons Licence

Prime minister David Cameron loves to portray himself as the defender of British sovereignty in his dealings with the EU. But as the volume of his anti-EU posturing increases, he is busy pushing for a deal that will hand the sovereignty of his country, and others, to multinational companies.

The next round of negotiations on the EU-US trade deal (also known as the Transatlantic Trade and Investment Partnership or TTIP) begin in Brussels on Tuesday 15 July. Talks started last July, and proponents of the deal seem to have hoped to rush it through with as little scrutiny as possible. They have been disappointed, as opposition to the deal has risen rapidly in both sides of the Atlantic.

In the US, trade unions and Democrat congressmen and women have prevented President Obama from fast-tracking the deal. Campaigners in Germany forced the European Commission to open a public consultation on one of the most controversial proposals in the deal – a plan to set up corporate tribunals with the power to override the decisions of elected governments. Some 100,000 people responded to the consultation – the highest number ever recorded. And Belgian MEPs were among dozens of campaigners arrested for protesting against the deal ahead of the European elections.

On Saturday 12 July, towns and cities across Britain will see health campaigners, environmentalists, anti-poverty groups and trade unionists protesting under ‘No TTIP banners.

As the diverse array of people lining up to oppose it suggests, the TTIP deal would affect many different aspects of life. But the common thread connecting objections to the deal is this: if agreed, TTIP would greatly diminish the ability of governments to make decisions for the benefit of their citizens. Democracy itself is under threat.

The part of the deal that has most enraged critics is a plan to set up supra-national corporate courts, in which companies can sue governments over decisions they think might affect their profits – even where governments have clearly acted in the public interest. This may sound like the stuff of fiction, unthinkable to anyone with any faith the democratic progress. In fact, it’s already happening.

Under similar parallel legal systems, tobacco giant Philip Morris is currently suing both the Australian and the Uruguayan governments for, respectively, introducing plain packaging for cigarettes, and daring to print health warnings on packaging. Veolia, the multinational waste and energy company, sued Egypt for introducing the minimum wage. And Argentina was sued for freezing energy prices to protect consumers hit by the country’s financial collapse.

In Britain, campaigners fighting to defend the cherished National Health Service fear that if a future government tried to renationalize the parts of the service that have already been privatized, it would be sued. And the need for companies to even use these courts could melt away – fear of being hit for billions of dollars could prevent governments from implementing policies that might raise the ire of the boardrooms. As well as preventing governments from acting in the public interest in the future, the TTIP deal would also sweep away years of hard-won regulations designed to protect people and the environment. One of the key issues on the table in the Brussels talks will be food standards, which are generally set much higher in Europe than in the United States. US agribusiness wants Europe to drop its ban on hormone-treated beef and pork and chlorine-washed chicken, and the American companies that sell these products have US Agriculture Secretary Tom Vilsack on side.

Financial regulation is another major battleground. Following the financial crisis, the US introduced an inadequate smattering of controls on its finance sector in an attempt to prevent another collapse. But the big banks see even this weak regulation as unacceptable, and are pushing for TTIP to knock it on the head.

Over the past few years, more and more of us have started to see our governments as acting in the interests of the rich and powerful. The EU-US trade deal could be seen as something of a test case. If we are to drag governments back to our sides, to be accountable to the people they were elected to represent, the battle to stop the TTIP deal is one we have to win.

Miriam Ross is a campaigner at the World Development Movement.

To join the protests taking place across Britain on 12 July visit nottip.org.uk.

Read New Internationalist’s guide to the two monster US-led trade deals – the TPP and the TTIP.

Comments on TTIP is an affront to democracy

Leave your comment







 

  • Maximum characters allowed: 5000
  • Simple HTML allowed: bold, italic, and links

Registration is quick and easy. Plus you won’t have to re-type the blurry words to comment!
Register | Login

  1. #1 Gerard 11 Jul 14

    All whilst the NATO enabled (and instigated!), expansion continues! Smoke and mirrors, clever stuff! There's a real infection in the body politic of Europe. Genuinely secret organisations doing shady deals with each other with no ’apparent’ central command but it's a looong way from ’New Hampshire’ to The Ukraine supply lines get stretched (even those supplying secure information), don't they Angela?

    Also see; ’Arafel’ gkhales.blogspot.co.uk ’’Never Under Estimate the Power of The Dark Side Mr.Secretary (re: John Kerry & The Ukraine)’ (with examples of Margaret Thatcher's European policies -ref-s-: etc.-, and Mr.Ron Paul), 26/04/14.

  2. #2 gwyn morgan 11 Jul 14

    TTIP is an afront to democracy, human rights and a insidiously evil threat to us all let alone our children & generations to come! It's already destroying the earth & humanity. A demonic monster that is being nutured by sheer greed by the rediculously small select bunch of the super rich who own these monstrous companies & banks worldwide! We must remember that each living creature has a right to live & exist in its natural place on earth! We minions to these Corporations must say no & stand together in our billions! Othetwise an unimaginable hell will be suffered by all but those elite on this earth!

  3. #3 Phil Randome 05 Feb 16

    The United States is a country that can be accurately described as a bully. Witness how it bullied Cuba for more than half a century. It is now seeking to subjugate a country's democracy by giving companies the right to sue governments via supra national courts. Having lived in the US & travelled its length & breadth I deem it to be a country devoid of honour & honesty. This can be exemplified by the takeover of Cadbury a celebrated UK chocolate manufacturer. The chief executive, Irene Rosenfeld, assured the British Govt., that there would be no redundancies in the workforce but within monthe the factory in Birmingham was closed & production was moved to Poland. The chocolate now tastes appalling, won't melt in the oven & is on a par with the disgusting Hershey Bars. Thankfully the British public are shunning it in favour of other chocolate makers. Cadbury/Kraft subsequently manipulated their profits & declared a loss in the UK thereby avoiding a multi million £ corporate tax bill. I never buy anything made by US companies & wouldn't trust them to polish my shoes in case they stole the shoe laces. TTIP be damned.

Subscribe to Comments for this articleArticle Comment Feed RSS 2.0

Guidelines: Please be respectful of others when posting your reply.

About the author

Miriam Ross is a campaigner at the World Development Movement

Read more by Miriam Ross

Get our free fortnightly eNews

Multimedia

Videos from visionOntv’s globalviews channel.

Related articles

Popular tags

All tags

New Internationalist Blogs

New Internationalist hosts several different blogs, from the Editor's Blog to the Majority World Blog, the Gaza Blog to the Books Blog

New Internationalist Blogs