New Internationalist

Are we sleepwalking into a fascist Europe – again?

nigelfarage [Related Image]
© Marian Kamensky

There are good reasons for attacking the European Union.

Its corporate and privatizing agenda – that puts the interests of business above those of citizens – its opacity, its democratic deficit.

But those are not the issues that get EU bashers like Britain’s Nigel Farage (UK Independence Party) or France’s Marine Le Pen (Front National) fulminating – and winning votes.

On the contrary, their complaints are fixated on the more positive, human rights related work that the EU has done – such as expanding freedom of movement, equality for LGBTI people, safety at work, environmental controls.

Another good thing the EU has been trying to do is regulate banks and cap bonuses.

But then that probably doesn’t appeal to former banker and commodities trader Farage or his élite chums either. The ex-public school boy’s ‘I’m just an ordinary bloke’ image, complete with fags, pint and classless accent, is carefully crafted. And like the best populists, he and his party claim that they are ‘just saying what others are thinking’.

Are they? Or are they tapping into fears and whipping up prejudices to target the wrong people, the wrong issues? You are poorer than you were five years ago. It must be immigrants coming over and stealing your jobs. Nothing to do with a global economic crisis set in motion by reckless bankers and a poorly regulated banking system. Or austerity policies used to raid public services and make profit for private companies. Or ever deepening income inequality. That’s complicated stuff, easier just to blame the Romanians next door.

The full impacts of the landslide ‘eurosceptic’ wins are yet to be seen. Pundits predict that because many on the centre ground (including the ‘reformers’) have lost their seats to the new anti-EU MEPS, the parliament will be far more polarized. On one side will be the eurosceptics who want a far weaker (or no) EU; on the other will be those (like Merkel) who want a more powerful, more integrated union. Ironically, the latter group now has a substantial majority and so could in theory push through their federalist agenda with greater ease.

But what about the impacts of the rise of the populist Right beyond the lobbies of Strasburg or Brussels?

Major political parties who have been given a bloody nose may try to emulate the victors by adding their voices to the echo chamber and wrongly blaming immigrants for all our woes. For them too, it’s easier than tackling the root causes. And as they have learned, you don’t need policies to win votes. You just need to make certain kinds of noises that trigger a pack response.

We underestimate the power of such dog-whistle politics at our peril. It’s not only the ease or speed with which clever populists can whip up casual racism or homophobia, but the long-term effects that tapping into these deep, enduring and toxic prejudices can have.

I was reading Leonardo Padura’s The Man who Loved Dogs when I heard the results of the election and had come a part where one of the characters is lamenting the complacency with which the Left responded to Hitler’s election win in Germany. Many believed he would be a spent force within a year.

Similar things are being said about Europe’s new rash of populists. And let’s not be fooled by the chummy bonhomie – fascism often comes with a friendly face, at first.

Greek voters, at least, had the clarity to express their anti-EU sentiment by electing far more MEPs from Syriza, the radical Left anti-austerity party, than from the neo-Nazi Golden Dawn. Meanwhile, Sweden provided the European Parliament with its first Feminist party member.

You have to savour the few rays of sunlight in an otherwise darkening landscape. 

You can find more of Marian Kamensky’s cartoons on his website.

Comments on Are we sleepwalking into a fascist Europe – again?

Leave your comment


  • Maximum characters allowed: 5000
  • Simple HTML allowed: bold, italic, and links

Registration is quick and easy. Plus you won’t have to re-type the blurry words to comment!
Register | Login

  1. #1 Jimbo2014 27 May 14

    European Integration will inevitably lead to an extremist backlash. It is doing the very opposite of what it claimed to do. It is causing disharmony and xenophobia by removing democracy from elected national parliaments. Just read what Tony Benn had to say about it.

  2. #2 Alan Roy Coates 27 May 14

    We shoud all look into the MIRROR with our eyes open. Not live in a dream world.

  3. #3 Matt in London 30 May 14

    You are summing up exactly what I think about the situation. Except for the ’nazi’ comparison. Call Nigel F. a self serving opportunistic jingoistic moron, maybe, but ’nazi’ he ain't (I am far more scared by people like Theresa May or France's pseudo-socialist Manuel Valls than by such loonies). I always ask myself ’what would they do that the current government isn't either doing or planning to do’, and seen from that angle most populist / anti-EU / ’mild’ far right movements wouldn't do significantly more harm than the abuse that minorities (and sometimes all of us) are facing under the current circumstances (think Yarl's Wood, the treatment of the Roma in France, erosion of our civil liberties, extraordinary rendition, etc. ad nauseam).

    Until a party is bold enough to offer a positive alternative to what the EU currently stands for (regulatory practices which favour only companies rich enough to afford an army of lobbyists, Atlantist jingoism, etc) those parties will go ahead since they stand in a vacuum. They have no ideas except that ’enough is enough’ attitude, which tired voters can be attracted to. As stated in this article, the countries where existed a strong alternative which mixed the capacity to say ’enough’ with some progressive thinking have usually put those ahead. See also the good showing of the Greens in the UK, who went from 1 to 3 MEPs (I am sure that they'd have done more had they properly advertised their ideas about the Guaranteed Income, amongst other things).

    One side note: what kind of party is the ’Feminist’ party in Sweden? ’Feminist’ can mean so many things nowadays, so what does this party stands for? It can well represent a positive way to get men, women and other genders on an equal basis, finding innovative ways to make them interact in harmony and without discrimination. Or it can be made of 'all-men-without-exception-are-evil-rapists' neo-feminist hate preachers hell bent on making men's lives miserable. I'd rather wait until I know more about them before categorising this MEP nomination as 'positive'. Scalded cat fears even cold water!

Subscribe to Comments for this articleArticle Comment Feed RSS 2.0

Guidelines: Please be respectful of others when posting your reply.

About the author

Vanessa Baird a New Internationalist contributor

Vanessa Baird lived and worked as a journalist in Peru during the tumultuous mid-1980s, and she maintains a passionate interest in South America. She joined New Internationalist as a co-editor in 1986 and since then has written on everything from migration, money, religion and equality to indigenous activism, climate change, feminism and global LGBT rights. She also edits the Mixed Media, arts and culture section of the magazine.

Vanessa’s books include The No-Nonsense Guide to World Population (2011), Sex, Love and Homophobia (2004), The Little Book of Big Ideas (2009) and, People First Economics (2010). In 2012 she won a prestigious Amnesty International Human Rights Media award.

Read more by Vanessa Baird

Get our free fortnightly eNews


Videos from visionOntv’s globalviews channel.

Related articles

Popular tags

All tags

New Internationalist Blogs

New Internationalist hosts several different blogs, from the Editor's Blog to the Majority World Blog, the Gaza Blog to the Books Blog

New Internationalist Blogs