New Internationalist

When did fair trade become a consumerist concept?

Fair trade bananas [Related Image]
Maxhavel/German Wikipedia project under a Creative Commons Licence

This week I got a call from my former university’s alumni magazine. This year, I was told, will mark a decade since the institution made the move to swap all of its tea and coffee – a million cups a year – to Fairtrade suppliers. In so doing, it became Scotland’s first – and Britain’s second – ‘Fairtrade University’. That decision followed a campaign involving a now-legendary Students’ Association AGM when so many people turned up to support the campaign, that every seat of Edinburgh’s largest lecture theatre was taken. People had to sit in the aisles, and then, as it kept filling up, on the stage.

It’s difficult not to feel philosophical, looking back. Fairtrade for most has become a depoliticized, consumerist concept, in some ways more comfortable for a Nestlé executive than a grassroots activist. But it wasn’t always like that. It emerged against the backdrop of the rise of the global justice movement, which was putting the unfair state of trade rules centre stage through their protests at international summits. Fair trade, for us, was a way of bringing those arguments home.

I started university in 2003, the year of the beginning of the Iraq war. The People and Planet group was already attracting nearly 100 to bigger meetings, having been leaders of the anti-war movement on campus. Demonstrating the early days of what would nowadays be called e-campaigning, we had a rapidly growing mailing list and a profile enhanced by creative actions at careers fairs against the weapons companies profiting from the war.

We knew that the rich countries weren’t only harming poor countries with their bombs, but with their economic policies. But campaigning in the abstract was difficult – even in an academic institution. The Fairtrade University idea was a way of tangibly standing in practical solidarity with the people the global economic system would otherwise be harming, while doing something important to most English and Scots people’s lives: drinking tea.

But it wasn’t only about the producers. It was also about us. Even though the New Labour government of the time thought there was no alternative to neoliberalism, here we were coming together in collective institutions like the Students’ Association and university, saying: we’re not just consumers, we’re citizens, too. Pioneering the concept of being a Fairtrade University was in a small way demonstrating an alternative to the so called ‘free market’ ideology which was already failing, and which led to the spectacular crash of 2008.

But best of all, the organizing was fun. There was a Fairtrade fashion show, a Fairtrade football tournament, a Fairtrade fair, Fairtrade wine tasting, a Fairtrade film and a Fairtrade photo exhibition. We also became one of the first universities to stock Fairtrade clothing. When the same people who had opposed our campaign for Fairtrade attempted to overturn the Students’ Association’s longstanding Nestlé ban, they were resolutely defeated. When local Green MSP Mark Ballard  won the contest for University Rector against the much better known Boris Johnson, the commitment to champion and extend the university’s Fairtrade status formed a central part of the winner’s manifesto.

The idea started snowballing. After re-affiliating to the National Union of Students (NUS) and learning about the intricacies of how student unions are supplied, we proposed to the National NUS Conference that the basic suppliers should be swapped to Fairtrade at all NUS unions. It passed, and they did. All the while the number of Fairtrade Universities blossomed. 

We were part of the movement that helped Fairtrade take off, in so doing building solidarity with countless producers. I’m proud of having been part of it, but still can’t disguise a speck of sadness. For us, as for the Fairtrade Foundation, fair trade was always a step to something bigger: we mobilized for the Make Poverty History march (for Trade Justice, Debt Cancellation and Aid – in that order) which converged on the Edinburgh Meadows in July 2005, and we supported the other G8 protests against the systems that keep poor countries poor. But others seemed to have different ideas about what fair trade could be used for. At first, the messages of support and the motions in parliaments from parties across the spectrum was exciting. But then, we began wondering whether politicians of governing parties might be using their statements in support of fair trade as a way of deflecting the responsibility for tackling global poverty back on to the voters, rather than taking action themselves.

Then the corporations cottoned on the success of fair trade. For them it was a way to improve their bottom line and to lessen criticism on other fronts. When Nestlé was allowed to use the mark on KitKats, it was a point of no return. Although we still supported fair trade, it could no longer help us explain the problems of corporate power or work to tackle it. At best, it could only be a way of ameliorating some of the worst aspects of the economic system.

I graduated in 2008, before the full effects of the financial crash and before the 2010 elections. Since then, the conditions and policies that we protested about being imposed on majority-world countries have increasingly been imposed on our own. From enforced austerity, to new trade deals handing yet more power to corporations to the increasing privatization of education, we don’t have to bring the issues home any more. They are here already.

So now the spirit is still there, but the character of the campaigns is changing. In comparison to the more recent waves of students breaking into Conservative Party headquarters and occupying their lecture theatres, our generation’s polite campaigns for fair trade tea and coffee seem almost sweetly reformist. But the work was born of a radical instinct, and a desire to see not just fair coffee, but a fair economy. That’s a struggle that’s very much continuing today.

Comments on When did fair trade become a consumerist concept?

Leave your comment


  • Maximum characters allowed: 5000
  • Simple HTML allowed: bold, italic, and links

Registration is quick and easy. Plus you won’t have to re-type the blurry words to comment!
Register | Login

  1. #1 Elliot 26 Mar 14

    A really nice article, but a few extra political arguments would have really helped this, such as the importance of supporting co-operatives for both ideological and economic reasons, and why creating this base is important for long term movement building. I certainly agree with your cynicism though, that it's been taken on by companies to mitigate the flak the likes of Nestle most certainly deserve. I think the problem is that for most people we expect quick and easy fixes, and that using multiple tactics seems too much effort for most people who want a just world ’now’ (or simply don't want to have to take some responsibility for their own consumption habits!).

  2. #2 Karen Bowman 28 Mar 14

    Great to hear your thoughts and remember your part in those early days.

    But we have moved on the debate from Fairtrade (label) towards a fair(er) trade (concept) - both Scotland and Wales are 'fair trade' nations so should have political will to move agenda on.

    The university is collaborating with staff, students and p&p to take supply chain sustainability further, ok still 'consumers'.

    You are welcome to blog at -

    You may be interested in -

    Best wishes campaigning and raising awareness of these issues.

  3. #3 Tim Gee 28 Mar 14

    Hello Karen, hello Elliot,

    We've got so much to celebrate from the rise of Fairtrade. I realise the above can read two ways - so to clarify the piece is meant as a case Fairtrade's radical roots and for the continuation of the spirit that inspired it.

    It's also a celebration of so many people having been involved in something that changed so many people's lives and supports so many Producer co-ops, and a thought-in-progress about what we can learn.

    I didn't know that Scotland is a Fairtrade Country now. That went ahead? I remember the announcement of the intention, and being a bit sceptical, because whilst Labour people were proclaiming their support for Fairtrade, their colleagues weren't acting on the movement's calls for trade justice. Still, increasing the spread of Fairtrade has to be a good thing for the people at the other end, and I hope as you say, it can be an impetus to move towards progress in other realms. We shall see!

    For all that though, as I said above, for many of us it was about more. Looking back I don't know whether It's possible that what we now know about Values and Frames ( Was it that Fairtrade was taken from us by politicians and corporations with other agendas, or was is that it is actually very difficult to argue for a new economic system at the same time as trying to get lots of people to buy a branded item? Or perhaps we could yet reclaim it to keep working for good and inspiring other projects, as it no doubt does on the local/university/place-of-worship level. I don't know. What do you think?

    Thanks both for all of your excellent ongoing work to make the world and the university a fairer place

  4. #4 Andrew Heald 30 Mar 14

    Interesting article - but I think fair trade fixes or at least tries to fix a more specific problem , Ghana those described in the article - it is basically an international standard of ’fairness ’ in commodity supply chains. Surely if sustainabilty and fair trade needs to be mainstream if it is to succeed - and yes that will mean multi national corporations making use of standards such as fair trade , fsc or organic. If these products are widely available in super markets for anyone to purchase then that'd a good thing and in turn should help the small producers and coops in the supply chain.

    If you don't like multi nationals, super,markets and consumerism - that's fine, but it's not fair trade problem to fix. If everyone only purchased fair traded products then the world would be a better place not a perfect one but certainly a slightly better one.

  5. #5 Karen Bowman 31 Mar 14

    Thanks Tim, Elliot, Andrew

    The radical or influencing approach are not mutually exclusive, so I include some upcoming webinars and lectures for interest:

    Socially responsible procurement (a better term to debate?) is rising so do feel free to join webinar University of Edinburgh, People and Planet and APUC all talking about this: electronics workers rights and better supply chain codes & audit (Sustain)
    Wed. 2 April between 12.00pm and 1.00pm open to non-members

    We now have a fair trade community of practice across HE and FE. (Members webinar on taking fair trade further)

    For more about the Fair Trade Nation and the active forum which promoting political engagement eg amending Scottish and EU law:

Subscribe to Comments for this articleArticle Comment Feed RSS 2.0

Guidelines: Please be respectful of others when posting your reply.

About the author

Tim Gee a New Internationalist contributor

Tim Gee is the author of Counterpower: Making Change Happen, shortlisted for the Bread and Roses Prize for radical nonfiction. He has campaigned with Occupy, Climate Camp, the Traveller Solidarity Network and the National Union of Students amongst others. He works as a grassroots trainer and has an MA in politics from Edinburgh University.

Read more by Tim Gee

Get our free fortnightly eNews


Videos from visionOntv’s globalviews channel.

Related articles

Popular tags

All tags

New Internationalist Blogs

New Internationalist hosts several different blogs, from the Editor's Blog to the Majority World Blog, the Gaza Blog to the Books Blog

New Internationalist Blogs