New Internationalist

Britain’s bedroom tax shame

Child's bedroom [Related Image]
The impudence of children having a room each in a family that receives housing benefit is being corrected by the British government's Bedroom Tax. Moyan Brenn under a Creative Commons Licence

Housing is a human right. That isn’t just my opinion, but also that of the authors of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights. Article 25 of the declaration, concerning the right to an adequate standard of living, is clear on the matter:

‘Everyone has the right to a standard of living adequate for the health and well-being of himself and of his family, including food, clothing, housing and medical care and necessary social services, and the right to security in the event of unemployment, sickness, disability, widowhood, old age or other lack of livelihood in circumstances beyond his control.’ (emphasis on housing is my own).

Not only does the above present housing as an integral part of an ‘adequate’ standard of living, it also highlights the need for security to be provided to those who have fallen upon hard times. The British benefit system is sometimes described as a ‘safety net’, designed to fulfil this role. In the case of housing, it is anything but. For those in British society who are most vulnerable – disabled people, the unemployed, single parents – the scuttled remains of the welfare state provide little help.

This is, of course, due to a disastrous piece of law: the Bedroom Tax. By reducing the housing benefit paid to those who have ‘too many’ bedrooms, the state is denying individuals part of their human rights and placing a financial squeeze upon the vulnerable. Just over a third of working-age housing benefit claimants are affected: approximately 660,000 people. While a yearly reduction of around £800 ($1,300) is just manageable for families where all the adults are working, it is disastrous for the more vulnerable.

People with disabilities are the most affected, with the Bedroom Tax not allowing for the adaptation and extra space many disabled people need to live comfortably. If, for example, your disability forces you to sleep in a separate bedroom from your partner, you will still endure a benefit cut. Families with more than one child are also singled out, with children under the age of 10 expected to share a room regardless of gender, and those under the age of 16 of the same sex are likewise expected to double up.

Education Secretary Michael Gove accidentally criticized this facet of the Bedroom Tax when he said in early September that: ‘There are children, poor children, who do not have rooms of their own in which to do their homework, in which to achieve their full potential.’ He is right, of course. The Bedroom Tax has resulted in more children being disadvantaged in this way.

Aside from these two groups, there is a wider issue: anyone receiving housing benefit payments is, by definition, in some way vulnerable and disadvantaged; otherwise they would not need support from the state. While certain groups can be singled out as being especially affected, the truth is that all those who have lost benefits have had their right to adequate housing infringed upon.

The Bedroom Tax is such an infringement that the UN sent Special Rapporteur Raquel Rolnik to Britain to investigate the law in relation to Article 25. While her full report is not due until next spring, the statement that she made at the end of her visit was damning. So damning that the government had to resort to a xenophobic, borderline sexist response delivered by ex-housing minister Grant Shapps to try to discredit her.

It doesn’t end with the Bedroom Tax. Housing is too complicated a field for a single policy, however unfair, to be the source of all the problems. There is a broader issue with housing in Britain, a legacy perhaps of the sale of council houses under the Thatcher government. Last year’s law criminalizing squatting, also has a part to play, making it even harder for people at risk of homelessness to find any housing at all.

In Britain we often flatter ourselves with how humane our society is. Why else do so many people come to settle here to escape oppression? However, at the edge of our vision, one of the most fundamental human rights, as important, even, as free speech, has been trampled upon. Is this right?

This blog is part of New Internationalist’s series on human rights for Blog Action Day 2013.

Comments on Britain's bedroom tax shame

Leave your comment







 

  • Maximum characters allowed: 5000
  • Simple HTML allowed: bold, italic, and links

Registration is quick and easy. Plus you won’t have to re-type the blurry words to comment!
Register | Login

  1. #1 Hmmmmm 16 Oct 13

    While I am absolutely 100% opposed to the Bedroom Tax, I also think it alarming that we now feel children under the age of 16 of the same sex are entitled to separate bedrooms by default. None of the kids with siblings that I knew at school had this luxury and we all turned out just fine. I actually think siblings sharing rooms can be a GOOD thing for society in general as it can encourage communal empathy from a young age.

    We'd do well in our vitriol of this hideous tax by remembering those who NEED the rooms who will be affected by yet another blanket tory policy that reflects none of the true nuances of modern society. We can do this by phrasing our complaints in terms of actual 'need' rather than a moral 'entitlement'. Neo-liberals find it much easier to criticise the latter.

  2. #2 Zoe 18 Oct 13

    How to post a comment without divulging too much personal stuff... The various systems (parental, religious, education, psychiatric, social services, welfare) all dumped on me from a great height for very many years. Life was a struggle every step of the way. In a cruel twist of fate I eventually found myself with a tenancy but starved out onto the streets. I survived a winter and, miraculously, returned to same flat. i fought very hard to try to rebuild my life. Now I'm beaten back down again, to an even worse place than before. All i have left is my home and they hit me with bedroom tax and want to take that away now too? How can i fight? All I have at my disposal is CAB and they no longer even have face to face drop in

  3. #4 Frank Forman 22 Mar 14

    The British prime minister, David Cameron recently told a reporter that disabled people would not be subjected to the bedroom
    tax but this is obviously a lie as in order to qualify for this benefit
    you need to show that you don't have the finances to pay
    for the extra burden of the tax (which many of us don't have) but to
    fill in such forms is quite stressful to say the least.
    Is it not unlawful for him to say this?

Subscribe to Comments for this articleArticle Comment Feed RSS 2.0

Guidelines: Please be respectful of others when posting your reply.

Get our free fortnightly eNews

Multimedia

Videos from visionOntv's globalviews channel.

Related articles

Popular tags

All tags

New Internationalist Blogs

New Internationalist hosts several different blogs, from the Editor's Blog to the Majority World Blog, the Gaza Blog to the Books Blog

New Internationalist Blogs