New Internationalist

Why I joined the second Battle of Hastings

Activists have been occupying trees to try and stop the road development.

Combe Haven Valley, which the proposed link road would go through, is ‘set within a high-quality landscape of historic and wildlife interest and contains peaceful and remote countryside’ (Report for a council meeting in 2004). It passes very close to a Site of Special Scientific Interest (SSSI), and is one of Britain’s most important wildlife sites.

My particular interest in this road, however, goes further than that. We need new roads in Britain like a hole in the head. Our traffic is already at levels that go far beyond what is sustainable, from every perspective: economic, social, health, environmental, or in terms of natural resources and climate change. Moreover, it is evident from every new road that has ever been built that traffic levels on the old roads do not decrease and ultimately exceed pre-new road levels anyway.

The scheme has been the subject of a prolonged fight which in October 2012 went all the way to the High Court. The project is one of over 40 ‘zombie roads’ previously declared dead but resurrected as part of the government’s largest road-building programme in 25 years.

It was with all this in mind that before dawn one very wet morning I got the train to Hastings and met up with fellow sympathizer ‘Andrew’. Together, we headed for an area which we had been told was likely to be the centre of attention that day. We found a tree that looked suitably ‘in the way’ and climbed it.

Soon after, a dozen tree surgeons arrived with around 20 security guards and bailiffs in tow, and a Police Land Rover. We continued setting up camp in the tree and the chainsaws started working.

While most of the security guards huddled under a bridge nearby to keep out of the rain, one that must have drawn the short straw huddled under our tree for five hours, asking periodically if we wanted to come down. Meanwhile, the chainsaws worked hard, felling trees all around us. But at the end of the day ‘our’ tree, and the four or five around us, were still there.

For a month activists have been defending the Combe Haven Valley, in what has been called the ‘second Battle of Hastings,’ putting themselves in the way, often subjecting themselves to prolonged periods of discomfort and the risk of arrest.

In the early hours on 14 January police, security and chainsaw operators moved in to evict the ‘Three Oaks’ protest camp on the proposed route. Trees were felled – including a 400-year-old oak. There are still two other protest camps standing – ‘Decoy Pond Wood Camp’ and ‘Base Camp’ – but police say they will be evicted this week.

What we need now is more people to occupy the remaining trees to stop the contractors completing their work by March. If we can do this, the breeding season will halt work on the road until next year, giving more time to challenge the road by other means to save the beautiful Combe Haven Valley.

Find out more from the Combe Haven Defenders website.

Comments on Why I joined the second Battle of Hastings

Leave your comment


  • Maximum characters allowed: 5000
  • Simple HTML allowed: bold, italic, and links

Registration is quick and easy. Plus you won’t have to re-type the blurry words to comment!
Register | Login

  1. #1 mark 16 Jan 13

    Whilst I respect your views and the right to protest, why don't you go to China and protest there? They have built 300,000km of new roads in the last 3 years and are building around 5000km of new motorway a year (for the past 15 years).

    Alternatively Europe: The UK has 3500km of motorway versus 12000km in France and 12000km in Germany and 15000km in Spain (CIA Factbook figures) and they still build the odd road or three.

    I am sure most people of Hasting will be grateful if you did either of the above and let them get on with building the relatively minor single carriageway bypass.

    Induced demand applies to all forms of improved transport not just roads.

  2. #2 Jeff12347 17 Jan 13

    What do you do to earn a living whilst your stuck up a tree, wasting tax payers money.

    You have already cost the local government a fortune, that could have gone towards hopspitals, schools etc.

    If you are on benefit you are supposed to be ready for work in your local area, not stuck up a tree the other side of the country.

  3. #3 Tom Druitt 21 Jan 13

    In response to Mark, I grew up in Sussex; I live in Sussex; and I care deeply about the Sussex countryside and about Combe Haven in particular. My granny lived in St Leonards, a mile or two from Combe Haven, and I want my children to be able to play there like I did when I was young. Visit it, it's beautiful.

    In response to Jeff, while I'm protesting, I'm also working. I run a small bus company employing 15 people; I have never been on the dole, never had any kind of benefit or tax credit and I have paid a lot of tax, both individually and through my business. I'm not bragging - I've been lucky and had good chances in life, and most of those I know who have been forced to accept government support/benefit wish they didn't have to. Ask anyone on jobseekers' allowance and they'll tell you they'd rather have a job.

    To both - come to Combe Haven and see for yourself.. it's beautiful and there are ever fewer places in the country like it. We need to cherish what we have - otherwise it will be gone.

Subscribe to Comments for this articleArticle Comment Feed RSS 2.0

Guidelines: Please be respectful of others when posting your reply.

Get our free fortnightly eNews


Videos from visionOntv’s globalviews channel.

Related articles

Popular tags

All tags

New Internationalist Blogs

New Internationalist hosts several different blogs, from the Editor's Blog to the Majority World Blog, the Gaza Blog to the Books Blog

New Internationalist Blogs