New Internationalist

Understanding the threat of Yemeni terrorism

The discovery last week of explosive materials in two cargo planes en route from Yemen has once again thrust the issue of Islamic extremism in this fragile Middle Eastern state into the spotlight. The incident follows September’s arrest of the two so called ‘dry-run bombers’ in Amsterdam Schiphol airport. Customs officials had allegedly found knives, boxcutters – the chosen weapon of the 9/11 hijackers – and a mobile phone taped to a medicine bottle in their luggage after they had flown in from Chicago.Both were US citizens of Yemeni origin.

Two months ago the Washington Post reported that CIA sources believe al-Qaeda in the Arabian Peninsula (AQAP) – based in Yemen – now represents a greater threat to the US security than al-Qaeda in Pakistan. This article came just a day after Amnesty International called on Washington to clarify the role of US forces in unlawful extra-judicial killings of al-Qaeda suspects in the country.

Since the attempt by a Yemeni-trained terrorist to destroy a US-bound plane (again at Amsterdam Schiphol airport) last Christmas, there has been a major crackdown in Yemen. An air strike against suspected militants in December killed 41 civilians, including 14 women and 21 children, and a US cruise missile attack in May mistakenly killed a Yemeni government official.

The Amnesty International report expresses concern about unlawful killings, arbitrary arrest, torture, unfair trials and enforced disappearances. It also highlights the way in which the distinction has been blurred between AQAP terrorists and Houthi fighters – separatists who have waged a rebellion against the state since 2004.

The role of the US military in air strikes in Yemen has never been publicly acknowledged, but according to the New York Times the US ‘provided firepower, intelligence and other support’ in raids across the country last December, and ABC News reported that this support has included cruise missile strikes.

Jihadism in Yemen has been fed over the decades by generations of volunteer fighters returning radicalized from conflicts abroad, such as the Afghan war against the Soviets in the 1980s, the invasion of Afghanistan in 2002 and the 2003 invasion of Iraq. But the roots of extremism in the country can be traced back much further. In the 1960s there was a serious conflict between the forces of radical Islamic fundamentalism, centred in Saudi Arabia, and the secular Arab nationalism of Nasser’s Egypt. A proxy war was fought out in northern Yemen. Fearful of losing access to the huge energy resources in the region, Britain and the US supported the Islamic fundamentalists. Now AQAP, led by US-born cleric Anwar al-Awlaki, is thought to be growing is size, and there are concerns that it is strengthening its links with Al Shabab militants in the Horn of Africa.

Whilst extremists in Yemen represent a growing danger to Western countries it is important that this real threat is not used as an excuse to act unlawfully or to breach human rights. If Western countries become complacent or complicit in allowing arbitrary arrest, torture and extra-judicial killings they will lose the moral high ground in the battle against extremist violence.

Comments on Understanding the threat of Yemeni terrorism

Leave your comment


  • Maximum characters allowed: 5000
  • Simple HTML allowed: bold, italic, and links

Registration is quick and easy. Plus you won’t have to re-type the blurry words to comment!
Register | Login

  1. #1 michaelhusayn 15 Nov 10

    moral high ground?

    ’If Western countries become complacent or complicit in allowing arbitrary arrest, torture and extra-judicial killings they will lose the moral high ground in the battle against extremist violence.’ This passage left me dumbfounded! The ’...west’ NEVER had the moral high ground. Since it first came into existence, the United States has been using state terrorism to impose it's political and or economic agenda on one group of people or another. Point out to me one period in history when the U.S. was not directly or indirectly involved in the exploitation of another people. I dont know if people just dont know history, or if they choose to believe that all of the sudden, after 200 years of state terrorism being official foreign and domestic policy, the U.S. has suddenly become the sole promoter of peace, justice, and human rights throughout the world. It's astounding.

Subscribe to Comments for this articleArticle Comment Feed RSS 2.0

Guidelines: Please be respectful of others when posting your reply.

About the author

Stefan Simanowitz a New Internationalist contributor

Stefan Simanowitz is a journalist, writer and human rights campaigner.

Follow at @StefSimanowitz

Read more by Stefan Simanowitz

Get our free fortnightly eNews


Videos from visionOntv’s globalviews channel.

Related articles

Popular tags

All tags

New Internationalist Blogs

New Internationalist hosts several different blogs, from the Editor's Blog to the Majority World Blog, the Gaza Blog to the Books Blog

New Internationalist Blogs