In India, the Dongria Kondh people took on mining giant Vedanta – and won. Responding to vigorous protest, the Indian government’s environment ministry denied the London-based company permission to mine in the Nivamgiri Hills, Orissa. Vedanta has lodged a court appeal. However, several shareholders have disinvested a total of $40 million from Vedanta in protest over the company’s human rights and environmental record.
Find out more: Survival International
In the Philippines, the struggle of the Palawan people against the MacroAsia Mining Corporation took a complex twist in June this year when 30 ‘fake’ tribal leaders went to Manila to show support for the company. The main indigenous organization, ALDAW, is accusing both MacroAsia and the national Commission of Indigenous Peoples of using highly manipulative strategies to crush opposition. The Palawan people are shifting cultivators, who survive by growing highland rice. Hundreds of mining applications have been made by companies seeking nickel and chromite from their lands. Open pit and strip mining would devastate the mountains and forests, pollute the rivers and the sea, and destroy the Palawan’s burial sites and spiritual places.
Find out more: No to Mining in Palawan
In Malaysia, a small group of Penan hunter gatherers have scored a victory of sorts over a giant oil palm firm, Shin Yang. The company had been clearing a forest area to which the Penan people were due to be resettled, to make way for the Murum dam project. But after protests, the Malaysian oil palm giant announced that it was halting work ‘pending verification from the authorities’ that the land had been designated for the Penan.
Find out more: Survival International
In Australia, aboriginal people set up road blocks to prevent Woodside Energy starting work on a liquefied natural gas processing plant at James Price Point, Kimberley (see picture). The A$30 (US$ 30.9) billion scheme has divided local aboriginal communities; in May this year traditional owners voted 60 per cent in favour of the gas hub. But the vote was taken under threat of compulsory acquisition and many families were excluded from the process, which some say was hijacked by the government of Western Australia. Local artist Charmaine Green is urging fellow indigenous Australians to open their eyes to ‘Mr Mining Man’ before it’s too late. ‘I just think the mining companies… have been quite dirty in their tricks: they’ve been wining and dining Aboriginal people… they’ve buttered people up and given them “lollies” to sign on the dotted line.’
In Canada, three indigenous First Nations – Athabasca Chipewyan, Beaver Lake Cree Nation and Enoch Cree – recently won a Federal Court ruling protecting woodland caribou who are threatened with extinction due to tar sands exploration in Alberta. This is a significant victory in the struggle against the destructive exploration of tar sands on indigenous land and could affect several leases. Despite the efforts by major oil companies such as BP and Petro Canada, a growing number are now joining the indigenous-led opposition to tar sands. For example, 61 First Nations have united to oppose a 1,170 km pipeline that would carry Alberta’s tar sands to the west coast.
In Nigeria, after years of denial, Shell finally admitted liability for two massive oil spills that devastated the environment and ruined the livelihoods of the Niger Delta’s Ogoni people. Compensation is expected to run into hundreds of millions of dollars.
However, the struggle continues for the Ogoni people, who are resisting plans to build a military complex on their lands in the Niger Delta. Activists suspect the plans are part of a government drive to further militarize the area in defence of Shell’s oil drilling activities.
In Chile the Mapuche people are mobilizing to resist the ‘legal theft’ of their genetic heritage following the Senate’s adoption of the International Convention for the Protection of new Plant Varieties (UPOV91), the so-called ‘Monsanto Law’. This law would prevent indigenous communities from saving seeds and would threaten their traditional free and collective exchange of plant varieties. Instead, indigenous communities will be exposed to the products of corporations like Monsanto, which already holds most of the world’s plant species patents. Mapuche poverty will deepen if they become reliant on hybrid or GM seeds and other expensive agricultural products sold by multinationals. Some 150 Mapuche community leaders have signed a declaration against the law.
REPUBLIC OF CONGO
The Republic of Congo has become one of just two countries in Africa that provides legal protection for its indigenous peoples. The other is the Central African Republic. Congo’s new law, passed in February 2011, had been almost seven years in gestation.
The country’s indigenous people, some of whom are known as Pygmies (see picture below), constitute a tenth of the population and the law’s aim is to counter their chronic marginalization. Currently, they are excluded from the education system and lack access to whatever state health services are available.
But there are serious gaps in the new law – it does not, for example, include the right to ‘free, prior and informed consent’ on developments that affect them.
Find out more: Rainforest Foundation UK
This first appeared in our award-winning magazine - to read more, subscribe from just £7