Sometimes the urge to fling the nearest available projectile at the television set can take some suppressing. I found myself struggling when, during the course of a news item on Burma, the anchor mentioned the military junta winning the country’s referendum on a new constitution. A strangulated ‘Aaaargghhh!’ emerged nonethless.
Now I know the news media sometimes have to resort to shorthand, but
this kind of passing reference confers legitimacy where none is
deserved.
Let’s consider the regime’s glorious achievement. In the first round
of voting on 10 May, people in the areas not affected by cyclone
Nargis went to the polls. In what was a voluntary vote, somehow over 99
per cent were reported by state media as turning up, of whom 92.4
endorsed the constitution. No matter that few of them would have had a
chance to have read the document and criticizing it had been declared
an imprisonable offence. Then two weeks later it was the turn of the
cyclone-hit. Somehow these people found time away from their struggle
for survival to vote en masse and approve the constitution by an
identical 92.4 per cent (knowing the superstitious nature of Burma’s
rulers, I wonder if the number has an astrological significance).
Earlier the Government had said that this new constitution would take
effect in two years’ time. But yesterday, a statement from the junta
leader Than Shwe read out on national television announced that the new
constitution had been ‘confirmed and enacted’. How’s that for speed.
But then, the regime is renowned for its efficiency. While
international aid was being delayed by the generals’ prevarications,
the official line was that the relief effort was already over and
reconstruction must begin. While foreign NGOs were pleading to be
allowed to reach the sick, hungry and dying, and aid shipments were
being confiscated, packages were being handed out on state television
to a token few. That they were a personal gift from their caring ruler
was printed in large letters, nearly obscuring the print stating which
country had originally donated them.
It is common knowledge that this year’s rice harvest in the region is
ruined. But not to the junta – it has ordered survivors to go and plant
their salt-logged fields anew. The regime’s confidence in its citizens
is inspiring. The state-owned paper The Myanma Ahlin proudly declares:
‘People from the Irrawaddy delta can survive on their own, even without
bars of chocolate donated by the international community… [they can
live on] fresh vegetables that grow wild in the fields and on
protein-rich fish from the rivers.’
And in order to go with the positives, all newspapers and magazines in
the country have been banned from carrying reports or images depicting
the destruction caused by the cyclone. Articles praising the
military’s aid effort or claiming that life is back to normal face no
such restrictions.
Meanwhile there is the irritating persistence of the country’s icon of
opposition – Aung San Suu Kyi. Recently her supporters kicked up a fuss
that state law demanded that after her latest five year stint of house
imprisonment (she has spent a total of 12 years in that condition) she
must either be released or face trial. Well, the top brass just brushed
aside the red tape and renewed her imprisonment for a further year.
Just like that.
Such efficiency extends not just to the regime but also all those who
come under its protective wing. I remember a conversation earlier this
year with L Dwelling, a Joint General Secretary of the Women’s League
of Burma, an umbrella organization women’s groups that lobbies the UN
among other things to get human rights violations against women in
Burma onto the international agenda. She mentioned a meeting during
which they released their 2004 report System of Impunity
detailing the extent of rape by the Burmese army in conflict areas. The
following day a woman delegate from the Myanmar Women’s Affairs
Federation (supposedly an NGO but in reality a mouthpiece for the
regime) declared that all the report’s claims had been investigated
overnight and found to be baseless.
Whenever reality gets inconvenient, hey presto, the Burmese authorities whisk up an alternate one.

Comments on Burma: Dizzying efficiency
Leave your comment
Registration is quick and easy!
Register | Login
#1 Richard 02 Jun 08
#6 BobPerryp 08 Apr 11
Subscribe to Comments for this article
Guidelines: Please be respectful of others when posting your reply.